User talk:Zelenitim

Dear Sir,

I am a responsible for Credit Agricole Serbija communication and advertising, so there is no problem in the sense of copyright violation since I am also the editor of our web-site (www.creditagricole.rs).

If you need to check anything, you might do it directly to my email address below.

Thank you for putting back the content.

Best regards,

Marko Putnik Head of External Communication and Advertising COO Division Crédit Agricole Srbija AD Novi Sad p:	+ 381 21 4 876 876 ext: 3200 e:  	marko.putnik@creditagricole.rs

Copyright problems with CRÉDIT AGRICOLE BANKA SRBIJA AKCIONARSKO DRUŠTVO NOVI SAD
Hello. Concerning your contribution, CRÉDIT AGRICOLE BANKA SRBIJA AKCIONARSKO DRUŠTVO NOVI SAD, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, CRÉDIT AGRICOLE BANKA SRBIJA AKCIONARSKO DRUŠTVO NOVI SAD appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CRÉDIT AGRICOLE BANKA SRBIJA AKCIONARSKO DRUŠTVO NOVI SAD has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JNW (talk) 13:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Please do not recreate the above article, it has been deleted for being copyright infringement and also not meeting wikipedia's guidelines of notability as per WP:CORP. If you feel like you have information that may allow it to meet these guidelines please let me know before trying to recreate this article. Also the fact you work for this organisation falls square into Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Regards Khu  kri  14:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I saw it. Thank you, but if I am referring to the official website what is more reliable than that? Please suggest the what would be the best solution. Thank you.

Zelenitim (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Also, these information are outdated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meridian_Bank. I'm trying to update it with the latest ones. Thank you for your help.

Best regards, Zelenitim (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The Meridian Bank article should be deleted as well, but I will give you time to assert notability. As I said the two articles are required to meet the criteria laid down in WP:CORP using information that is referenced, relaibly sourced & verifiable, it is up to you to assert the subjects notability. Please remember this is an encyclopedia and not a tool to gain exposure for your organisation, so the fact that you have already stated you work in advertising for these banks leaves me very little option than to believe you are doing this for self publication. Regards Khu  kri  15:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

OK. Thank you. Would like to update the data only. I can see that other banks (in Serbia) broaden their articles. I'll try to make references according to the policies of the Wikipedia. Does this mean that I can work on the article or not?

Thank you for the help.

BR, Zelenitim (talk) 15:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm going to take a close look at most of them in the list article, to see how many have asserted notability, but I may take quite a few to WP:AFD to gain greater concensus, where you will be able to have your say there. Regards Khu  kri  15:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Would you be so kind to tell me if I may continue to work on the article or not? Thank you.

Regards, Zelenitim (talk) 10:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)