User talk:Zenbanjo

BLP violation
Zenbanjo, the material you are adding at Ravi Zacharias violates WP:BLP. Please familiarize yourself with this policy. Among other things, it states that editors must "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation". The content you added is not reliably sourced; it is based on a blog posting, and that's quite unacceptable. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Ravi Zacharias shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meatsgains (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)