User talk:ZenoSquared

Mass of universe (Mu ) Dimensional Radius (dr) Mass, yes good old relative mass (m) Linear Constant, 0.41520467836 (1)

e=-1(1/c^2), mc^2=1: thass right, your not drunk

e=[[(m/dr)+(m/1dr)]+[(m/2-m/dr)+(m/2-m/1dr)]c^2 m=[[(m/dr)+(m/1dr)]+[(m/2-m/dr)+(m/2-m/1dr)] e=[[(m/43.5964912277)+(m/0.41520467836)]+[(m/2-m/e)+(m/2-m/0.41520467836)] m=[[(m/e)+(m/0.41520467836)]+[(m/2-m/43.5964912277)+(m/2-m/0.41520467836)]

m=10, e=8.98755179e17 e/c^2=[[(10/43.5964912277)+(10/0.41520467836)]+[(10/2-10/8.98755179e17)+(10/2-10/0.41520467836)] e/c^2=10.2293762575 m=[[(10/8.98755179e17)+(10/0.41520467836)]+[(10/2-10/43.5964912277)+(10/2-10/0.41520467836)] m=9.77062374245

m=255, e=2.29182571e19 e/c^2=[[(255/43.5964912277)+(255/0.41520467836)]+[(255/2-255/2.29182571e19)+(255/2-255/0.41520467836)] m=[[(255/2.29182571e19)+(255/0.41520467836)]+[(255/2-255/43.5964912277)+(255/2-255/0.41520467836)] m=3.21555866e-9, e=289000000 e/c^2=[[(3.21555866e-9/43.5964912277)+(3.21555866e-9/0.41520467836)]+[(3.21555866e-9/2-3.21555866e-9/289000000)+(3.21555866e-9/2-3.21555866e-9/0.41520467836)] m=[[(3.21555866e-9/289000000)+(3.21555866e-9/0.41520467836)]+[(3.21555866e-9/2-3.21555866e-9/43.5964912277)+(3.21555866e-9/2-3.21555866e-9/0.41520467836)]

m=6.5115*10^-9, e=585224435

Redacted Redacted

m=9e-31, e=8.08879661e-14 e/c^2=[[(9e-31/43.5964912277)+(9e-31/0.41520467836)]+[(9e-31/2-9e-31/8.08879661e-14)+(9e-31/2-9e-31/0.41520467836)] e/c^2=-1.1126501e-17 m=[[(9e-31/8.08879661e-14)+(9e-31/0.41520467836)]+[(9e-31/2-9e-31/43.5964912277)+(9e-31/2-9e-31/0.41520467836)] m=1.1126501e-17

This stupid f-ing chart says: as the mass of an object drops below the speed of light as it accelerates, there is a point that its energy and mass become related: e=-1(1/c^2), mc^2=1. How can energy be relative to mass, if energy divided by the speed of light squared is equal to the exact opposite of what mass times the speed of light squared is equal too?

Because the following equation ONLY works for the mass of the universe,

Mu-[(Mu/1dr)+(Mu/2dr)+(Mu/3dr)+(Mu/4dr)+(Mu/5dr)+(Mu/6dr)=s1 Mu-[(Mu/2-Mu/1dr)+(Mu/2-Mu/2dr)+(Mu/2-Mu/3dr)+(Mu/2-Mu/4dr)+(Mu/2-Mu/5dr)+(Mu/2-Mu6dr)=s2 s1+s2=-1(Mu)

3*10^55-[(7.2253521e+55)+(2.4084507e+55)+(1.2042254e+55)+(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)+(1.3894908e+54]=-8.9120229e+55, s2 3*10^55-[(-5.7253521e+55)+(-9.084507e+54)+(2.9577465e+54)+(7.7746479e+54)+(1.2874896e+55)+(1.3610509e+55)]=5.9120229e+55, s2 s1+s2, (-8.9120229e+55)+5.9120229e+55=-3*10^55

and this equation works both for the mass of the universe and masses less than that,

v1=3e55-[(3e55/43.5964912277)+(3e55/0.41520467836)]

v2=3e55-[(3e55/2)-(3e55/43.596491227)+[(3e55/2)-(3e55/0.41520467836)]]

3e55=[3e55-[(3e55/43.5964912277)+(3e55/0.41520467836)]]+[3e55-[(3e55/2)-(3e55/43.596491227)+[(3e55/2)-(3e55/0.41520467836)]]]

v1+v2=3e55

m=[m-[(m/dr)+(m/1dr)]]+[m-[(m/2)-(m/dr)+[(m/2)-(m/1dr)]]

Mass it's self must be equal to:

m=[[(m/dr)+(m/1dr)]+[(m/2-m/dr)+(m/2-m/1dr)]

Variable proofs:

(123/19/2)-[(124/18/2)]=-0.20760233918, f2

-1dr=(f2*2)*[(3-1)/2]=-0.41520467836

-2dr=(f2*2)*[(7-1)/2]=-1.24561403508

1dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(3-1)/2]=0.41520467836

2dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(7-1)/2]=1.24561403508

3dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(13-1)/2]=2.49122807016

4dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(21-1)/2]=4.1520467836

5dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(69-1)/2]=14.1169590642

6dr=(0.20760233918*2)*[(105-1)/2]=21.5906432747

Mu=3*10^55

Mu/1dr=7.2253521e+55

(Mu/2-Mu/1dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/0.41520467836)=-5.7253521e+55

Mu/2dr=2.4084507e+55

(Mu/2-Mu/2dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/1.24561403508)=-9.084507e+54

Mu/3dr=1.2042254e+55

(Mu/2-Mu/3dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/2.49122807016)=2.9577465e+54

Mu/4dr=7.2253521e+54

Mu/2-Mu/4dr=7.7746479e+54

Mu/5dr=2.1251036e+54

(Mu/2-Mu/5dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/14.1169590642)=1.2874896e+55

Mu/6dr=1.3894908e+54

(Mu/2-Mu/6dr): 3*10^55/2-(3*10^55/21.5906432747)=1.3610509e+55

if,

Our theoretical 'surface processes'

Mu-[(1.2042254e+55)+(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)+(1.3894908e+54)]=7.2177995e+54

3*10^55/7.2177995e+54=4dr,

Our theoretical 'sub-surface processes'

Mu-[(2.9577465e+54)+(7.7746479e+54)+(1.2874896e+55)+(1.3610509e+55)]=-7.2177994e+54

1.4435599e+55 switches flipped

Lets try and peek from a lower dimension, to a higher one, 3 looking into 4

(7.7746479e+54)-(1.2042254e+55), or (Mu/2-4dr)-(Mu/3dr)=<0, time stops

While processing this:

3*10^55-[(1.3610509e+55)+(1.3894908e+54)]=1.5e+55

1.5e+55-[(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)], the fourth dimension is visible but,

1.5e+55-[(1.2042254e+55)+(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)], viewing the third is impossible, and net negative

But,

This can be processed:

3*10^55-[(1.3610509e+55)+(1.3894908e+54)+(1.2874896e+55)+(2.1251036e+54)]

Now, lets find the missing dimension of antimatter (we add in our one and two dimensions)

3*10^55-[(7.2253521e+55)+(2.4084507e+55)+(1.2042254e+55)+(7.2253521e+54)+(2.1251036e+54)+(1.3894908e+54]=-8.9120229e+55

3*10^55-[(-5.7253521e+55)+(-9.084507e+54)+(2.9577465e+54)+(7.7746479e+54)+(1.2874896e+55)+(1.3610509e+55)]=5.9120229e+55

(-8.9120229e+55)+5.9120229e+55=-3*10^55

then,

A 1d point,

wg=[(7.2253521e+55*-5.7253521e+55)/0.41520467836]*6.67408e-11

ng=(7.2253521e+55*-5.7253521e+55)/2.49122807016

Process:

3e55-[(7.2253521e+55)+(-5.7253521e+55)]=1.5e+55

A 3d process

3e55-[(1.2042254e+55)+(2.9577465e+54)]=1.5e+55

So processing a single point in three dimensions, is equal to:

1.5e+55-1.5e+55=0

The observation principle.

But, if we process our electron two dimensionally via a cpu:

wg=[(2.4084507e+55*-9.084507e+54)/0.41520467836]*6.67408e-11

ng=(2.4084507e+55*-9.084507e+54)/2.49122807016

(wg/ng)/(4dr*2)=c

Now, we check if we have enough to process:

3e55-[(2.4084507e+55)+(-9.084507e+54)]=1.5e+55

[(7.7746479e+54)*2]-1.5e+55=5.492958e+53

and there is enough to process four dimensionally (I think :-!)

{

If

[((3e55*10^500)/2-(3e55*10^500)/1.24561403508)/0.41520467836]*6.67408e-11=wg

[((3e55*10^500)/2-(3e55*10^500)/1.24561403508)/2.49122807016=ng

(wg/ng)/4dr*2=c

}

Proving insanity is relative.. Alternativity

We gots links,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_black_holes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_359

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_X-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MACS0647-JD

https://www.google.ca/search?client=opera&q=hubble+constant+value&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

brad bIll bUsch

UBandI iMages

Why you may ask? Because there is no one left to submit a unified field theory to }

bRad bIll bUsch UBandI iMages