User talk:Zeouspom

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Here are some other hints and tips:


 * I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username.  (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~&#126;). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~&#126;). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

A belated welcome, which I have put at the top of your talk page for your convenience. NinaEliza (talk • contribs • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= logs ] • email ) 02:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Pablo Ganguli
To restore the article you must list it at Deletion review. Please see our Undeletion policy regarding the policy and the procedure. - Aksi_great (talk) 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense pages
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Majestic Petra Festival) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --cj | talk 13:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * sorry but people such as yourself abuse their wikipedia rights. why have you deleted my pages? they are leading international festivals and you call them nonsense? how very ignorant! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeouspom (talk • contribs).


 * Perhaps my labelling of the articles as nonsense was incorrect. However, they still qualified for deletion. Please cease using Wikipedia to promote Pablo Ganguli.--cj | talk 22:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * "perhaps it was incorrect"? so now you are saying you are unsure? im not promoting him but the work this young genius is doing worldwide. just google him. and also why did you delete the international festivals? why dont you delete kiran desai, shobhaa de, shabana azmi, hay festival? sorry but wikipedia is ridiculous. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeouspom (talk • contribs).


 * No, I'm saying it's open to interpretation. It is clear you can't approach this with a neutral point of view, which is precisely the problem, not to mention the lack of a single reliable source – yes, I've looked.--cj | talk 22:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * single reliable source? neutral view? please have a look at the following then. many thanks indeed. i have been to all his festivals since im mad about literature and cultural diplomacy. i appreciate your help. i thought wikipedia was all about providing accurate info. the guardian and the times in britain hailed him as one of the country's youngest literary impresarios organising international festivals all over the world to promote britain.
 * http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,923-2133343,00.html
 * http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4153/is_20060824/ai_n16700982
 * http://www.tehelka.com/story_main20.asp?filename=hub101406vanityfair.asp
 * http://news.independent.co.uk/people/pandora/article2073007.ece
 * http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1019841
 * http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/yasmin_alibhai_brown/article358243.ece
 * http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/UK-MAG-JULIO-INGLESIAS-KEVIN-PIETERSEN-PABLO-GANGULI_W0QQitemZ220058096315QQihZ012QQcategoryZ2242QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 * http://connectunitedkingdom.tripod.com/
 * http://in.news.yahoo.com/060331/43/639aj.html
 * http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1663470,00110004.htm
 * http://www.forbes.com/business/fyi/2005/1212/045.html
 * http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story/0,,1922721,00.html
 * http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/10/03/do0305.xml
 * let me know if you want more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeouspom (talk • contribs).


 * I'm not particularly impressed with any of the links you provided. I don't feel any of them would solidly satisfy notability criteria. --cj | talk 23:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * kitab is india's annual festival of literature. jewel of russia is st petersburg's only international cultural relations festival. Arts in Marrakech and Majestic Petra are the only Arab international festivals of their kind in the Arab world. Pablo Ganguli has earned his reputation as a leading cultural guru among the Moroccan, Indian, UK and various cultural worlds...and with due respect, a wikipedia editor is not impressed? how very sad! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeouspom (talk • contribs).

Your note on my page
You posted a note to my talk page that cited my comment at Articles for deletion/Pablo Ganguli, and said ''You are VERY wrong! Please get your facts right. He has directed a great number of festivals all over the world and they are all renowned featuring eminent world-class personalities. and Connect UK is the UK's south pacific cultural diplomacy body which he founded and directed at the age of 17. not in charge of anything at all? Remember - ignorance is not an excuse?''

I notice that you've not been able to convince other editors that the links you've provided meet WP:RS standards. So perhaps this page would be a good place to have some further discussion on that, before you spend a lot of time writing (more) articles that will just get deleted. For example, what links can you provide (below, not on my talk page) that show that Mr. Ganguli has directed (let's say) at least THREE "renowned" festivals, and that they featured "world-class" personalities? John Broughton |  Talk 02:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

here they are
let me know if you want more links. i work closely for a company that does mr ganguli's events management in london.


 * India’s international literary festival, April 2006 - now in article
 * Article in Evening Standard on him, August 2006; mentions festivals in India and Morocco and his forthcoming one in Petra, Jordan - now in article
 * http://www.tehelka.com/story_main20.asp?filename=hub101406vanityfair.asp - needs to be added
 * http://news.independent.co.uk/people/pandora/article2073007.ece - needs to be added
 * http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1019841 - needs to be added
 * http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/yasmin_alibhai_brown/article358243.ece - not a good link
 * http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/UK-MAG-JULIO-INGLESIAS-KEVIN-PIETERSEN-PABLO-GANGULI_W0QQitemZ220058096315QQihZ012QQcategoryZ2242QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem - eBay auction item; auction has ended; unclear how this possibly could comply with WP:RS
 * http://connectunitedkingdom.tripod.com/ - URL can be cited in "External links" section, but no content can actually be used - does not meet WP:RS because it's a tripod.com (user) site
 * India festival; article dated March 2006 - needs to be added
 * http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1663470,00110004.htm - appears to be exactly the same story as at the yahoo.com site
 * http://www.forbes.com/business/fyi/2005/1212/045.html - needs to be added
 * - Majestic Petra Festival - not happening, article from October 2006 - needs to be added
 * [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/10/03/do0305.xml - Arts in Marrakech, March 2005 - now in article

Okay, I'm convinced
Okay, there should be an article on him. One thing, first: you need to read WP:COI, since that limits what you should do.

I suggest starting by getting a copy of the last (now deleted article) put into your user space, where you (and I can help) can get it into shape to be put back as a Wikipedia article, in such good condition that no one would even think about suggesting it for deletion. Getting such a copy is called userification; you do it by requesting a copy here. When you've done that, please let me know (mention that the deletion was on November 18th via AfD). John Broughton |  Talk 17:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


 * sorry - all very confusing since im no expert. please could you kindly help? 18:41, 17 December 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeouspom (talk • contribs)


 * Okay, I'll ask for a copy of the article, but it's going into your userspace, as User:Zeouspom/Pablo Ganguli, unless an admin objects. Also, please follow Sign your posts on talk pages, even for your own talk page.  Thanks.


 * Also, as an aside - I don't think the individual festivals in and of themselves deserve separate articles, but they certainly should have a paragraph or so, each, in the Pablo Ganguli article, and there can be redirects so that someone looking up a festival will end up in the appropriate section of the main article. John Broughton  |  Talk 18:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I deleted the userfied version and restored the edit history behind the protection. It can be reviewed here. Please redelete after an appropriate time span. ~ trialsanderrors 20:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Article deleted
The page has been deleted and locked once again as you continue to recreate the article. I have told you before to take the matter to Deletion review. If there is consensus there to recreate the article then the page will be unlocked and the article created. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It would be better if you follow the suggestion given by him above closely. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Zeouspom - I'll talk to Aksi, if necessary.


 * Please DO NOT delete text from your talk page, particularly the discussion we're having - among other things, those links are very useful. Moreover, blanking the page might be taken as meaning that you didn't want me to see Aksi's comment.  I'm sure that's not the case - as you probably know, there isn't really any way - short of action by an administrator - to truly "delete" anything that a user has done, but other editors might misunderstand.


 * Also, you really could do me a big favor by reading and FOLLOWING Sign your posts on talk pages. It's very simple - you put four tildes at the end of your comment on a talk page.


 * Finally, DO NOT under any circumstances create ANY new articles related to Pablo Ganguli without discussing it with me first. You may be very close to a violation of WP:COI that could get you banned from Wikipedia; if you've not read that policy, I urge you to do so now.  The right way to do this is to build a really good article over the next week or so, as a user page, and THEN follow the process (which we'll discuss then) to get it approved to be added back.  If you try to bypass that process and post the article again - or any other article related to Ganguli - you'll probably just get in trouble, and I'm as likely as not to decide to spend my time elsewhere.  I'm helping out here because I do think this could be a useful article for Wikipedia, but if you screw things up, I really don't have enough interest to get entagled with your problems.   John Broughton  |  Talk 19:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Next steps
The article is now at User:Zeouspom/Pablo Ganguli. I've removed all the promotional wording; please do NOT put it back. Think about writing an article that will be in Encylopedia Briticannica, not a press release, please. To that end, I suggest reading WP:NPOV and WP:V in addition to the other policies mentioned above.

The goal is to edit the article WHERE IT IS. Do not move it, copy it to another location, use parts of it for a new article, copy parts of it to other articles, or otherwise do anything but add to it.

I suggest starting by
 * copying the links, above, that you've cited, into the article (I've set a new section)
 * coverting a couple of links (say, the Forbes article, and the one that you found in findarticles.com - Evening Standard, I think, into citation form - WP:CITE. I'll then take a look.

I've very hesitant about you adding text to the article until you've mastered how to do citations. That's because virtually every sentence in the article probably should be referenced/footnoted. Take a look at George Allen (politician) as an example of how many sentences are footnoted. So once you've mastered how to do a cite (it's not that hard, really; I suggest editing the whole page and doing previews), THEN you should add text and a cite; add more text and another cite, and so on. If you just add text, you're going to have to go back and figure out where the information came from and THEN add a cite. John Broughton |  Talk 22:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

my version
many thanks indeed. please have a look at the page now and advise when you have a moment. Zeouspom 09:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I did some editing: I converted the three sources in the "References" section into (foot)notes per WP:CITE (although I didn't use the formal notation for citations; you can make such changes if you want).


 * What's important is, as I mentioned elsewhere, that virtually every sentence needs to be documented. I've done that, and put "citation needed" tags where the three articles did not provide any support for text in the article.  (And, obviously, the three articles wouldn't have been expected to cover everything.)


 * What would be good, now, is if you would try to do the same. (a) Find an article from a good source (Forbes is one), and (b) look through the article for neutral facts - what the festival was about, the speakers, etc.; background on Ganguli, whatever;  (c) copy the sentences with those facts to the article, and (d) tweak them a bit to avoid copyright violations, then (d) add the citation (start with a "ref" tag, end with a "/ref" tag).  In the first note/cite, use a "name" field to identify the cite (for example, "Paper-YY-MM-DD"), as described at WP:CITE.  If you find some text that supports what now has a "fact" tag on it, you should (e) remove the "fact" tag, since a citation is no longer needed.


 * In other words, the next step is for you to do what I just did, but with other sources, adding more information. Just do one or two, and then let me know that you've done some, and I'll take a look and give you some feedback.   Thanks.  John Broughton  |  Talk 19:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * And thank you for signing your talk page postings. John Broughton  |  Talk 19:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You did a small amount of copyediting. You didn't add any sources (such as Forbes), which I thought was surprising, since you went to all the trouble to find a number of good links (above).  The article still has lots of "citation needed" tags, which needs to change - either a source is found for these tagged sentences or they have to be deleted.


 * I realize that I could expand and improve the article solely by myself. I'm trying to avoid that temptation because I don't want to maintain it, and because if you don't learn how to put stuff correctly into the article, any updates that you do to it could very well cause trouble.  If you don't have any futher time for improving the article, let me know, and I'll consider my options, but right now the article is NOT ready to go public in any.   John Broughton  |  Talk 21:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

October 2006 source
You wrote there was a huge article in october about him in the saturday times magazine and all his future festivals but there is no onliny version sadly of the piece. Wikipedia doesn't require a source to be online in order to be used. It's helpful, of course, and offline sources are regarded a bit more skeptically, but if they're accessible in a library, they certainly are acceptable for Wikipedia if they meet WP:RS.

Would you be willing to post, here, the text that you'd like to add to the article? (There are copyright issues if a large amount of text from a source goes into a Wikipedia article unchanged, so if you can post here what you think is the most relevant parts of the article, I'll pick and chose from that, and change some wording, and add it to the Wikipedia article we're working on.) Thanks. John Broughton |  Talk 01:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the Saturday Times article info. You didn't mention the actual date.  Also, do you want any other info from that article other than the Russia event to go into the Wikipedia article?  If so, you should type that out here.  John Broughton  |  Talk 22:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Article status
Thanks for the additional sources you posted on my talk page. I'd already looked at all of them, and decided that they didn't have anything additional to add to the article. (Yes, they described Ganguli in different ways, but the fastest way to get this article rejected is to make it look like a vanity piece, with different folks gushing over Ganguli - how much he's accomplished, how exotic he looks, how surprised they were, etc.) At this point, we really have enough articles describing the two festivals that have taken place; more citations just look like we're adding citations for the sake of citations, which isn't good.

What I'd really like, to finish the article and get it put in Wikipedia officially (it's already coming up pretty high in Google searches, by the way), is anything on the Russian and Turkish festivals. Do you have any links to official websites for these festivals? Any link to any news article that even mentions them? If not, we're going to have cut the text back to something like "Ganguli has also discussed holding a festival in St. Petersburg in October 2007 and a festival in Turkey in 2008, but nothing has been officially announced." So any links that you can provide would be greatly appreciated. John Broughton |  Talk 23:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, please provide (below) the sentence mentioning the Russian festival as well as a full article detail (author, date, page number if you have it, article title), formal title of newspaper. As for Turkey, we can go with "A festival in Turkey in 2008 has also been mentioned." - the counterpoint british council page (what's the URL?) will be okay for that, I think.  John Broughton  |  Talk 03:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Article is now at deletion review
You'll find the article listed at Deletion review/Log/2007 January 8. Please do NOT modify the article under ANY circumstances until the deletion review is finished. If it needs changes, let me know. Also, I strongly recommend AGAINST your commenting at the deletion review - let others decide. John Broughton |  Talk 00:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Three editors have commented positively on the article, and I expect that to continue, and, more importantly, the admin who deleted the article hasn't opposed the re-creation of it. But the process is hardly over yet.
 * As for what to do next, the answer basically is "wait". At some point (either when the regular time is up - five days?) or when it becomes clear there is a consensus (which could be in only a day or two), an admin will close the discussion and take action.  If things continue as they're going, that action will be the admin moving the article from your user space (that is, from where it is now) and making it into a regular article. John Broughton  |  Talk 15:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Looking at Deletion review, it looks like all items that are more than six days old have been closed. So, to answer your question, we wait two days (at most).


 * And, technically, I don't think we can move the article into mainspace, even if we wanted to; I believe creating the article again requires an administrator. Even if we could move the article, we'd be extremely foolish not to let the process run until it closes.  There have been only positive comments about re-creating the article (with some minor, and well-justified caveats), and there is no reason to do anything that would cause problems at this point.   John Broughton  |  Talk 01:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Thanks for leaving the article alone while it was undergoing deletion review.


 * On a slightly different section, do you know how to do redirects? If not, you might read Redirect.  The festivals should not have their own articles, but it's quite acceptable to set up redirects (festival names) that point to the Ganguli article, and you might want to do that.   John Broughton  |  ♫ 23:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:13485542.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:13485542.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Pabgan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pabgan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pabgan.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pabgan.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pablo5.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pablo5.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Is_13485542.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Is_13485542.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:-4.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:-4.jpg. The copy called Image:-4.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:-4.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:-4.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:P.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:P.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:-4.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:-4.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pablo Ganguli Morocco.JPG
If Samuel Shimon is you, you could just put "Photo taken by User:Zeouspom" instead. If that's not you, who is it, and how or where did you find this photo? --Geniac (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Pablo Ganguli
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 13:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Pgang.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pgang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 19:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ditto for Image:Pablo Ganguli.JPG. --Geniac (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pabloganguli2008.jpg
"Russia Festival Photo" is not a source, it's a description. Please provide a source. --Geniac (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Liberatumlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Liberatumlogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pabloganguli2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pabloganguli2009.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Liberatumlogo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Liberatumlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Pabloganguli2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pabloganguli2009.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pabloganguli2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pabloganguli2008.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Also File:Pablog.jpg and File:Pablo Ganguli Morocco.JPG. Please let me know if you need help or have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PabloGang.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PabloGang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "Liberatum Official Blog" is not a valid URL. --Geniac (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Ditto for File:Pabloganguli09.jpg. --Geniac (talk) 03:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:PabloGang.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:PabloGang.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --Geniac (talk) 23:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pablo-ganguli415.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pablo-ganguli415.jpg, which you've sourced to Rebecca Reid. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PabloGanguli111.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:PabloGanguli111.JPG, which you've sourced to Rose Johnson. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pabloganguli2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pabloganguli2008.jpg, which you've sourced to Liberatum Private Photo Library. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Kitab2006.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kitab2006.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)