User talk:Zep Kalb

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Jonathan talk - contribs - review me! 17:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Don Kalb
Hi. I noticed that you had some problems with the Infobox Academic template, so I made a couple of modifications to it. In the process I discovered a warning attached to the image, File:DonKalb.gif, saying that you should submit a copyright statement lest the image be deleted. Don't panic — you have a week in which to do it :) Cheers, Favonian (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Bernese Mountain Dog
FWIW, I like the picture. Whether some of the other editors think differently is always subject to speculation. But I think it's a nice addition. Happy editing. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC) Stan

File:Loupa.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Loupa.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)