User talk:Zerkly

Please stop your zapping of the S1C6x article. It is not up to you to decide if it is notable or not. If you are sure it isn't, then bring it to Articles for Deletion where you can gain consensus. You may however read the guidelines at WP:N first. I see that your account is made only to zap this article, which is very weird as well... what are your intentions? DeVerm (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * First of all, I would direct you to Assume good faith. Secondly, Just because I created an account and setup a redirect doesn't mean I have ill intentions thank you very much. I created an account so I wouldn't need to be editing with my IP address (I had an account years ago and I simply don't remember the login for it). Wikipedia seems to be adding increasingly pointless articles and that's one of them, hence the redirect. You say it's not up to me, but actually, yes, yes it is up to me (and everyone else), I was being bold and following Redirect which recommends a redirect instead of deletion. But since you're insisting of reverting my rational and forward attempt I'll proceed with a formal deletion process. --Zerkly (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * your bold redirect was fine and I assumed good faith with my revert. It was your repeat edit/redirect without discussion where I lost the faith because a revert means your edit is not acceptable without further discussion. On the new account: your only actions were on this article and WP:SPA applies. I have no special feelings towards this article other than having it tagged before and saw editors address those concerns meaning they want it to stay. DeVerm (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)