User talk:Zero360Swagger

December 2016
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lincoln–Douglas debates— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 19:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lincoln–Douglas debates. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lincoln–Douglas debates was changed by Zero360Swagger (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938383 on 2016-12-05T19:49:03+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lincoln–Douglas debates, you may be blocked from editing. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)