User talk:Zerogravity565792

Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sist.in/?id=campus. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology
A tag has been placed on Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Your defense of Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology
I see that at Talk:Sarabhai Institute Of Science And Technology you have written "The contents is from our college site.. The contents are 100% trustworthy". I have two points to make in connection with this:
 * 1) Whether the contents are "trustworthy" is irrelevant: the reason for the nomination for deletion is that the article appears to be a copyright violation. If you have read the speedy deletion notice on the article you will have seen that this is so.
 * 2) Even if the copyright problem is cleared up it is still likely that the article will be deleted, as it is written in away which appears to be promoting the institute, rather than objectively reporting. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)