User talk:Zeven08

Speedy deletion of Mobilewipe
A tag has been placed on Mobilewipe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quartermaster (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Carried over from Mobilewipe talk page
Since talk pages of deleted articles usually get deleted, I thought I'd copy the text on that talk page here since it might clarify some things.

The MobileWipe platform lifts the Mobile Device Management abilities from basic SyncML capasities to more advanced management (delete phone, lock phone, locate phone). The world should know that Mobile Device Management is more than SyncML, OTA and other.

Example on others that promote "unique" technology :
 * Zyb
 * funambol

If Mobilewipe is deleted then the above sites and tousands more should also be deleted.


 * Your assertion is correct. There are probably thousands of other advertisements disguised as wikipedia articles that should be deleted. That is not a defense for this article. However, there are only a finite number of us who "patrol" the new articles. FYI, though I put the "speedy delete" tag on the article, I do not have the authority to delete it. An administrator will either agree, or disagree, and act appropriately. Don't assume deletion will take place. Thanks for the heads up on Zyb and funambol. I'll go give them a look too. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * FYI, I just tagged Zyb for speedy deletion as spam. It had apparently been deleted before but has somehow been resurrected. The other item, funambol, has previously survived a proposal for deletion discussion, primarily because it is a well-known open source project, hence, I did not apply a speedy delete tag to that article. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * FYI (2), ZYB has been deleted by an administrator (though the Zyb "redirect" is still around but I've flagged that for deletion as well). --Quartermaster (talk) 16:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)