User talk:Zgmet

February 2014
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Son of Man. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. I have moved your edit to the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 10:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Immanuel Kant because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''In the future, please add any new argument at the bottom of the page or in the proper section without deleting previous edits. '' Sjö (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Immanuel Kant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:John Locke and Talk:Age of Enlightenment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed (see WP:TALKNO). If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --Omnipaedista (talk) 01:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not post personal essays in user talk pages
Please stop using talk pages such as Logic for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. --Trovatore (talk) 07:24, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Just a little side note here, probably not relevant now. I kind of messed up this message in at least two ways. First, the heading should have said "please do not post personal essays in article talk pages", not "... user talk pages". Second, I should have said to quit using talk:logic for that purpose rather than Logic itself. I doubt this matters anymore to Zgmet, but I wanted to clarify for the benefit of anyone else who may read this. --Trovatore (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)