User talk:Zhangwl

Fork of Michael Sneed article
Hi Zhangwl - I have deleted the content fork you recently created (Michael Sneed's rumor). I am not sure of your motives in splitting off this copy of the Michael Sneed article, but that's not the way to go about dealing with any content issues you may have with the original. Possibly you wanted to make the article explicitly on the reporting incident rather than the individual columnist concerned; however you would be better advised to integrate any such information into the main Virginia Tech massacre article itself. There is already a section there discussing the ramifications of the early incorrect ID.--cjllw ʘ  TALK 02:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, I see that you've recreated that article. While I can understand your motives, I do not think that this is the best course of action to take at the moment- please refer to my recent comments at Talk:Michael Sneed. In any case, the title you have chosen is not appropriate, or informative.
 * Note that, the Michael Sneed article is now only being considered for deletion, it may or may not be kept in the final outcome. I would respectfully ask that you await the outcome of the deletion review and see what consensus (if any) arises on the appropriate action and organisation of the material.--cjllw ʘ  TALK 02:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Zhangwl. Please come to Chicago Sun-Time to help edit the Controversy section. Please also take a look at the discussion page. Thanks. --Dongdongdog 02:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)