User talk:Zhaohao Huang/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well? ·Lead - good overview of general concept ·Usage - covers the various use cases ·Covers the difference between knowledge and non-knowledge based systems pretty well, and how they’re used. ·Covers the challenges and drawbacks pretty comprehensively What changes would you suggest overall? ·There’s a lot of acronyms all very similar to each other, making it hard to decipher what’s being discussed at any one time. ·General grammatical rewording could help in clarity. ·Lead - why is is important for Medical AI? What is the importance of the systems themselves? Usage ·Add a small lead to the section on how there are various types of diagnostic support systems. Then break the section into subheaders covering each. ·Use cases should be more generalized and then give an example rather than use the specific example as the use case. ·More links to specific medical terminology if it’s not being explained in the paragraph (Point of Care etc.) Knowledge based v. non-knowledge based can be main headings ·Mentioned HL7 CDS - but no explanation or link to what that is or it’s relevance ·More information on how the rules are formulated vs. what the machine learning option does ·Could use a little restructuring of sentences. Advantages ·What are the advantages without EHR? If it requires EHR make it the main heading instead of an ‘Advantages’ section What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? ·Edit for clarity and add in explanations or links for more technical or healthcare related content. CatherineRey19 (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)



What does the article (or section) do well? '''I like how this article has been organized compared to the previous edit, it is more concise. There is good amount of explanation on the usage of this system and the tone in the article is consistently neutral, not favoring any particular application. I like how the barriers and advanages have been mentioned but what disadvantages are there to implement this system?'''

What changes would you suggest overall? '''There are a couple of grammatical errors that need to be taken care of. And some places need citation.'''

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Correcting the grammatical errors, adding more specifically about what is being done and by whom (one of your sources is using CDSS in cervical cancer) Adnannurani98 (talk) 16:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)