User talk:Zhinz

Katherine isn;t Kate
Katherine Kane as Batwoman is NOT the same as Kate Kane, in fact they go out of their way to call her Katherine the younger. It's an entirely new character with a new concept and shouldn't be confused with Kathy. I know it's annoying, but there you are. My guess would be Katherine the Elder is (or was) the original Batwoman, but no, they're not the same. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 02:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Budvar
Hello, I am missing time to edit the topic carefully, so I only want to mention on your talk page, that your reasoning according the merging is not well-founded. (Not talking about merging itself - just the reasoning)

Your statement: "but I can't find a single country (other than the Czech Republic itself) that recognizes Budějovický Budvar's right to that name ... at this point, as they are members of the EU, which, has recognized Anheuser-Busch as the rightful owner of the Budweiser name." seems to me to be litlle uninformed or unmature in qulification and I do not mean it in any wrong light, ... just really, that not so difficult to google it out... exactly about the usage of that brand there exist so long disputes between Anheuser and Budvar and they are not resolved in favor of Anheuser, at least not generally.

That situation is simply unfortunate for both brewerys, as both of them established their brands in a time, when they had no anticipation that they could meet and compeet in any single market. Each of them started independently on the "market success" of the other. For both of them is the second holder no help in marketing, as the drinkers their produkts feel the produkt of the second mostly as imitator with perversion in taste and no help no good advertisement, such situation is not usible for stealing of the seconds market or brand, it is only obtacle in P.R.

You surprised me by statement that:"...has recognized Anheuser-Busch as the rightful owner of the Budweiser name" - that is very far from the truth, no germen speaking country is recognising Anheuser-Busch's Budweiser, while some are recognising Budvar for dozens of years. In absolutely each of the remaining European countries except five (from fifty), the situation is not resolved in favor of Anheuser-Busch, some did closed in favor of Budvar, some are still not finished. The trademark is recognised for Budvar for example, in Great Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Greece, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, New Zealand... (that mean that not only in EU Budvar won). When I traveled through Austria, what do you think what people think, when I am talking about Budweiser? (Budvar as for centuries ... Budweiser was imported into Vienna from Budvar directly, centuries before the compeny Budvar was oficially founded ... And when I was on summer job In Scotland 8 years ago, I was surprised to find that musicians in pub was drinking Budweiser Budvar ... as was I then. ... That brand is well build in Europe for Budvar, to the similar extent as unchallenged in most of uneuropean countries of the World is for Anheuser-Busch.


 * http://www.budvar.cz/en/web/Znacka-Budvar/Znamka-Budvar.html
 * And This the most interesting review I have found about the dispute and division of trademarks in brandchannel.com. Simply, it is not as simple as You state.

Have good time  R eo  ON   |   + + +  14:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

World Beer Cup


You've done lots of work on that article.

You deserve a pat on the back.

Some people put these awards on their user page. Would look nice there.

Keep up the good work.  SilkTork  * SilkyTalk 14:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

media markets and their images
If you wish, i can get to work on creating mini-images to go with each DMA template. :) RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 04:26, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * About Image:TvDMAmap.gif; could you possibly create an SVG version of this map with state lines? Also the map should include Alaska and Hawaii. --  Denelson83  04:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Double redirects
Hi there. Just thought I should let you know that when you turned For Your Eyes Only into a redirect to For Your Eyes Only (disambiguation) on February 18, you accidentally created some double redirects. I've corrected these, but you should make use of the 'what links here' button to avoid creating them in future. Thanks for reading. Terraxos (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

List of overweight actors in United States cinema
You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Zhinz
Hi Zhinz, are you still active in the National Football League Draft. Do you have any attachment to that article and would you be against the article taking on a new direction w respect to the supplemental draft table? 66.234.33.8 (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3rd Streamy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of World Beer Cup for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Beer Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/World Beer Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jytdog (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

"Natiuonal Boss Day" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Natiuonal Boss Day. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gaioa (T C L) 00:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)