User talk:Zhjsb

April 2021
Hello, I'm Ts12rAc. I noticed that you recently removed content from Royal Challengers Bangalore in 2021 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ts12rAc (talk) 09:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

He was now the owner of royal challengers Bangalore Zhjsb (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mitchell Thompson, you may be blocked from editing. ''STOP creating articles on Under-19 cricketers. It has been explained to you that these players are not deemed notable enough to qualify for articles, yet you have decided to ignore advice and continue to create these. You are wasting your own time by creating these articles and by constantly doing so you are engaging in disruptive editing.'' StickyWicket (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

U19 cricketers
Hi. Please DO NOT create articles for cricketers who have only appeared at the U19 Cricket World. U19 cricketers do not meet the notability requirements, per WP:NCRIC. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok thank you Zhjsb (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emannuel Bawa


The article Emannuel Bawa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "There is this article but it's not enough for WP:GNG on its own. The rest are just passing mentions and database sites. Fails NCRIC as noted above."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Robert Woodman (cricketer)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Robert Woodman (cricketer). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Robert Woodman. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robert Woodman. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Craig Lewis (Irish cricketer)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Craig Lewis (Irish cricketer). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Craig Lewis (cricketer). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Craig Lewis (cricketer). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Stop creating duplicate articles
Please stop creating new articles for cricketers who already have an article. If you wish to improve the encyclopedia, update the existing article instead. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Indian Premier League
 * added a link pointing to David Warner
 * Punjab Kings
 * added a link pointing to Gagandeep Singh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mrittunjoy Chowdhury for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrittunjoy Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mrittunjoy Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 06:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Omkar Salvi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Omkar Salvi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Mrittunjoy Chowdhury, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Royal Challengers Bangalore, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mitchell Thompson


A tag has been placed on Mitchell Thompson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 13:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 16:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)