User talk:Zhmr

Welcome!
Hello, Zhmr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Eleassar my talk 20:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Template:Spanish Kingdoms
I agree you but before my change Realm of Toledo appeared as Kingdom so it could be confused as the same level of the Kingdom of Castile, why appears the Realm of Toledo before my change and no other than Murcia or Seville? It also appears a no well-known, short-lived and small kingdom related with Navarre. If you think there are a lot of subdivisions I agree with you but If the Castilian Realms are removed from this template, the Realm of Toledo and the strange Kingdom linked with Navarre (Kingdom of Viguera) should remove too. Kingdom of Castile and Crown of Castile are different, Crown of Castile= Kingdom of Castile + Kingdom of León. Kingdom of Galicia is related with the Kingdom of León, so Galicia Kingdom sould remove too.--Heralder (talk) 20:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I think you are right, in my opion should remove:


 * Castilian Realm of Córdoba · Castilian Realm of Jaén  · Castilian Realm of Murcia  · Castilian Realm of Sevile  · Castilian Realm of Toledo and Kingdom of Viguera.


 * Viguera because there were other short-lived kingdoms like the Kingdom-City of Zamora with Queen Urraca. For this reason I think Viguera should be deleted too.


 * The Kingdom of Galicia is a different case It was really important so it should appear at this template.


 * and the Crowns of Castile and Aragon with subdivitions in different lines are better and reduce the mess.
 * Are you agree?--Heralder (talk) 20:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You 've had a good idea, I think León is not a problem in this template, is earlier as other kingdom Only a detail Asturias was an earlier kingdom origin of León (and Castile) Marca Hispanica was the frankish border of Charlemagne. Navarre appeared time after so, in my opinion could be better:


 * Kingdom of Asturias · Marca Hispanica


 * Kingdom of León (Kingdom of Galicia) · Kingdom of Castile · Kingdom of Aragon · Kingdom of Navarre


 * Crown of Castile (Castile-León) · Crown of Aragon (Principality of Catalonia · Kingdom of Valencia · Kingdom of Majorca)


 * Are agree with my little advice?--Heralder (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Only a tiny detail, it is the most correct form and appears this article at Wikipedia.


 * Kingdom of Asturias · Marca Hispanica · Kingdom of Navarre · Kingdom of León (Kingdom of Galicia) · Kingdom of Castile


 * Crown of Castile · Crown of Aragon (Kingdom of Aragon · Principality of Catalonia · Kingdom of Valencia · Kingdom of Majorca)


 * In the past Crown means Compound Kingdom or Kingdom of Kingdoms (Crown of Castile, León and Castile; Crown or Lands of the Crown of St Stephan, Hungary and Bohemia (Chequia Slovaquia and other central Europe regions)
 * What do you think? Heralder ( talk ) 21:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much--Heralder (talk) 21:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingdom of Syrmia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Braničevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Slavic


 * List of Serb countries and regions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Byzantines

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Izet Hajrović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kingdom of Syrmia


The article Kingdom of Syrmia has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Borsoka (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duchy of Franconia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Franken and Medieval Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatia at the FIFA World Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marko Babić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Vindelicia a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mikaey, Devil's advocate  21:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)