User talk:Zhurnalist21

"While the catch phrase pretends to be inoffensive on the surface, the subtext is that it's "only okay to be white", and as a result most people perceive it as racist."

This is purely editorial and one person's point of view. I'd prefer to keep it factual if possible. This strikes me as someone reading into the flyers precisely what 4chan intended. In turn it somewhat discredits the article. Are there any other opinions on why this is OK to keep in?

Zhurnalist21 (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Zhurnalist21
 * Hello, and welcome to contributing to the encyclopaedia.
 * After a bit of searching I discovered that you were referring to the article It's OK to be white, which wasn't at all obvious. You should say what article you are referring to, preferably putting it in double square brackets like this: It's OK to be white, which will create a link to the article.
 * I completely agree with you, and you will be 100% justified if you remove that sentence from the article. I suggest giving an edit summary saying that you are removing an expression of a point of view, or something to that effect.
 * On a completely different matter, you were very lucky that I saw your message here. Very rarely does anyone have any reason to look at a user talk page of a new editor with no other editing history, so your message could easily have never been seen by anyone. A comment or question about editing specific article should normally go on the article's talk page, in this case Talk:It's OK to be white, rather than on your user talk page. Also, if you do post a general request for help here, you are much more likely to get an answer if you put above your message. That will result in your talk page being added to a list of pages where there are requests for help, so that sooner or later someone will come along to see what help you want. (It can sometimes take a while, so you may need to be patient.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)