User talk:Zigriyar

Molecular diagnostics
I've had a go at formatting one reference for you. You may like to use that as a template. It's worth reading this essay on how to produce good articles and WP:ACADEME on the weird differences between Wikipedia and the world you may be used to. Fiddle  Faddle  08:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I've found the correct articles for your citations and put them into the article. Good work on getting one of them almost right. The syntax is arcane, I fear. Happy to hold your hand on this, but I can't deal with the content, that is not my field. Fiddle   Faddle  10:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Good second try on citations. Please, though, do try harder. I am assuming you work in a complex and rigorous discipline, so please bring that rigour to your articles.
 * With regard to the nomination, below, as a copyright violation, I am as certain as I can be that the MD article is also one, but I have not yet been able to find it. Please be aware that it WILL go if it is found to be in breach of copyright, and that adding copyright items to Wikipedia is both forbidden and will most definitely result in your being blocked from editing here. Please take greater care. Fiddle   Faddle  11:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571489467 your edit] to Molecular diagnostics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * by three separate devices or combined into one device.  {cite News|last1=Gibbs|first1= JN||title=Regulatory pathways for molecular diagnosis. Detailing the

Speedy deletion nomination of PH-stat


A tag has been placed on PH-stat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.scientistlive.com/content/21483. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)