User talk:Zihao Yang1030

Mining
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mining. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Opolito (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Opolito,
 * Thank you for your feedback. I understand the concerns regarding the addition of external links to Wikipedia articles and the guidelines against using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion.
 * The links I added were meant to provide authoritative references to support the claims made in the article. These links direct readers to official documents and standards provided by recognized organizations like the U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). These organizations are highly relevant to the topic of mining cables, as they establish and enforce the standards that govern the industry.
 * Here are the reasons why these links are valuable:
 * 1. **U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)**: This link leads to electrical standards that are crucial for understanding the regulatory framework governing mining cables in the U.S. The MSHA is a reputable source of information for mine safety regulations.
 * 2. **International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)**: The IEC develops international standards for electrical and electronic technologies, including those applicable to mining cables. This link helps readers access globally recognized standards.
 * 3. **Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)**: The IEEE is another authoritative body that sets standards relevant to mining cables. The link to their standards provides additional context and technical details necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
 * 4. **Australian Standards (AS/NZS)**: This link points to standards used in Australia, ensuring the article includes information about regulations from different regions.
 * These sources are not personal websites or promotional content but rather authoritative references that enhance the credibility and informational value of the Wikipedia entry. I believe their inclusion helps ensure the article is well-supported by verifiable, high-quality references.
 * I appreciate your attention to maintaining the quality and neutrality of Wikipedia and welcome any further discussion on the associated talk page.
 * Best regards,
 * ZIhao Zihao Yang1030 (talk) 06:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This is your edit. The only link it contained was to felchun cables. It did not contain any of the links you claim it did. Opolito (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mining Cable (July 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mining Cable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mining_Cable Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SafariScribe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mining_Cable reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 06:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mining Cable


A tag has been placed on Draft:Mining Cable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello Zihao Yang1030. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zihao Yang1030. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi DoubleGrazing, Thank you for your message and for bringing these important points to my attention. I want to address your concerns thoroughly and clarify my intentions regarding the article on Mining Cables.
 * First and foremost, I would like to clarify that I am not receiving any form of compensation for my contributions to Wikipedia. My edits are motivated by a genuine interest in providing accurate and comprehensive information on topics of technical and industrial importance, such as mining cables. If any impression of paid advocacy was given, it was unintentional and I apologize for any misunderstanding.I believe that with these revisions, the article now strictly adheres to Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and notability. The information provided is factual, supported by authoritative sources, and devoid of any promotional content.
 * I respectfully request that the article be reconsidered for inclusion based on its educational and technical value. If there are further specific issues that need to be addressed, I am more than willing to make the necessary adjustments.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration.
 * Best regards,
 * Zihao Yang Zihao Yang1030 (talk) 07:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mining Cable (July 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mining_Cable Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 Waqar 💬 06:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Appeal Against Rejection Due to Notability Concerns
 * Dear Waqar,
 * Thank you for your review of the article submission on Mining Cables. I would like to appeal the decision based on the grounds of notability. The topic of mining cables is indeed notable and warrants inclusion in Wikipedia for several reasons, supported by reputable sources and industry standards.
 * Mining cables are critical components in the mining industry, ensuring the safe and efficient operation of mining equipment. Their importance is underscored by the extensive safety standards and regulations developed by leading organizations.
 * These standards highlight the critical role that mining cables play in maintaining operational safety and efficiency in mining activities globally.
 * Mining is a major global industry, and the cables used in these operations are integral to the industry’s infrastructure. The economic impact of mining cables is significant, influencing the productivity and safety of mining operations worldwide.
 * The topic of mining cables is undeniably notable due to its significant impact on the mining industry, safety regulations, technological development, economic influence, and educational value. I respectfully request a reconsideration of the article's notability based on the points outlined above, supported by authoritative references.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration.
 * Best regards,
 * Zihao Yang Zihao Yang1030 (talk) 07:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You appear to be here to promote Feichun Special Cable, by creating this draft and inserting spammy links to existing articles. Promotion of any kind is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please stop now. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I have only listed the leading manufacturers in the mining cable field in Germany, the United States and China. If this information is misleading marketing, I have removed it from the article. Zihao Yang1030 (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's quite true. You are adding links to Feichun, and only Feichun, to a number of articles. In your 'Mining Cable' draft you listed three suppliers, one of which was Feichun, and you then linked to several PDFs, all from Feichun, as well as an inline external link again to Feichun. I assume there is a reason for that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I would recommend you read WP:INDY to learn more about what constitutes an independent source and WP:RS for guidance about what constitutes a reliable source. If you are able to find sources that are both independent and reliable that establish WP:NOTABILITY, then you will be much more successful as a Wikipedia editor.
 * I was able to find a source that might be good as a starting point to find useful sources:
 * It is nowhere near enough on its own to establish notability, but at least it is authored by researchers working for the US Government and is published in an IEEE publication. 135.180.172.169 (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Stop promoting Feichun Cables
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Mining. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Opolito (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)