User talk:Ziji/Sandbox

I like it
A much better idea than having a single controversy stand alone - which is POV of it's nature and does tend to wind up sidelining the opponents of the DSM line, whether it is intended to or not.

Needs mention of theological multiplicity too though. If only because those are the oldest records of the concept. The Christian Trinity, a variety of Greco Roman pantheistic multiples, Isis/Osiris, and the incredibly complex atypical multiplicities within Hinduism and Obeah. Yes? --Zeraeph 13:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It's quite a struggle to get my little head around the singularity/multiplicity fractal of consciousness, and then you come along with the complete mind blower of including monotheism/polytheism uncertainties - Oh yes! Have you the time and inclination to do it?--Ziji 22:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Me and my big mouth...not this week, but maybe soon I can add something. --Zeraeph 23:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Whilst I was playing around in the sandbox just now, I saw a way to add it as a new section under schizophrenia. So I will start there and you can drop in when time and space allow. I notice I am only adding to the sandbox now and fairly soon the merge will be inevitable in my process. Changes to the controversy page then won't be reflected in the new merged article. Given that it's early days and you are the only responder from the controversy page, I think I will wait until mid May before being BOLD and merging. What do you think? --Ziji 23:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than start another controversy I will concentrate my efforts on the multiplicity page.--Ziji 22:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)