User talk:Zikessel22

Speedy deletion nomination of Zach kessel


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Zach kessel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ray Romano has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ray Romano was changed by Zikessel22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855726 on 2016-04-01T14:33:59+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Ortiz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  16:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Romano, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madagascar (franchise). Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Madagascar (franchise) was changed by Zikessel22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88556 on 2016-04-01T22:04:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mexico
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mexico, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! –Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Ryan Church
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Prof. Mc (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Grayson Allen
You vandalized the Grayson Allen page with 4 quick edits. I've reverted them. Further vandalism will result in more warnings. Please stop. Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grayson Allen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Romano, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration. Peaceray (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Radiphus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Louis C.K. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Radiphus  06:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to Billy Graham appears to be vandalism and has been removed. Please don't make disruptive edits on articles. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jacob Zuma, you may be blocked from editing. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism, and serious BLP violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)