User talk:Zillakilla

Your edit to evolution

 * Note: I am not interested in any topical discussion - see WP:FORUM. This is to explain why your verifiable fact was removed from the article Creation-evolution controversy.

The fact that Darwin spent more pages in his book to debunking his own theory is irrelevant to the creation-evolution controversy, therefore it should not be written about per WP:UNDUE. A couple of reasons why: And more. User:Krator (t c) 15:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The number of arguments is usually not related to the truth of the proposition. The strength of the argument is.
 * Darwin is not the only, and certainly not the most conclusive defender, of evolution theory. He happened to be the first one to think it up.