User talk:ZimZalaBim/Archive 2

Media ecosystem
I'm not sure why User:Rhobite originally recommended a redirect, but I agreed with his reasoning on the talk page due to two things: one, there is little content in regards to media ecosystem at this time, and two, the relationship to McLuhan's term media ecology is clear, although I agree that the academic discipline probably doesn't cover it. The media ecosystem (in particular its relationship to the blogosphere) is a subset of media ecology, in relation to McLuhan's concept. I have no problem with keeping it on a separate page, but you might want to contact Rhobite as well. At this point I can see a link being made on the blogosphere article to Hiller's term on a separate page. At your request, I am moving the section back to a separate page. Any information you can offer or share on improving this page are appreciated. --Viriditas | Talk 10:39, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Re : VfD: Marko Alaupovic
Hi Mtz206,

Thanks for your message. No, it is not required to go through VFD again. Articles re-created after VFD are candidates for speedy deletion, under the clause Reposted content that was deleted according to Wikipedia deletion policy. I've just performed the speedy deletion on the article so it should be gone (if recreated yet again, use the template.

Cheers, Mailer Diablo 07:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Terry Stotts
Well, he's been announced. Do you really think you needed to revert it two times? --WikiFan04ß 18:07, 8 Jul 2005 (CDT)
 * He wasn't announced at the times of the edits: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball (BTW, your initial edit mispelled his name). --mtz206 23:35, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

The West Wing (television)
Hey there! I've posted a response to your comments at The West Wing (television). -Rebelguys2 18:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Marshall McLuhan
Thanks for fixing it. I did not do my revert correctly and then found you had removed that blogs. Thanks again FullSmash26 22:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)