User talk:Zimbabweed/Archive1

NEW BIG L MEMORIAL SITE
First I want to say how wonderful this wiki for Big L is. But please explain if you would why BIG Ls fathers memorial site would not be a valuable addition to the site!!

International response to Hurricane Katrina
"Poor countries such as El Salvador, Argentina, and Sri Lanka offered help to the USA. It is also noteworthy that countries which have bad relation with United States also proposed help: Cuba and Venezuela. US Citizens may not be aware of this due to poor information by mainstream media outlets."

I’ve worked on International response to Hurricane Katrina, precisely because it provides information about the international community that might otherwise get lost. I was the one who included El Salvador, Sri Lanka, Cuba and Venezuela. But when a paragraph like this is included (which is clearly Point of View) the whole article risks deletion. That’s why I removed it. Try to incorporate that information (in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines of course) in a more relevant article, such as Political effects of Hurricane Katrina or Media bias in the United States. Thanks. --Tsaddik Dervish 03:22, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Grammar 101
It might be arguably grammatically correct to say "The White Sox is a major league team" but that is incorrect usage in America. Team nicknames are always treated as a plural subject, even when the nickname is a singular word. For example, "The Minnesota Wild have defeated the Detroit Red Wings." The British take it a step farther. They might say "Chicago have won the World Series", whereas Americans would say "Chicago has won". In America, the city is singular and the nickname is plural. You could only say "is" if the sentence is worded as "'The Chicago White Sox' is the name of a major league baseball team," which sounds about as weird as saying "The White Sox is..." Wahkeenah 12:20, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 21% for major edits and 44% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:SP-s10e04-censor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SP-s10e04-censor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Renaming NYC neighborhoods
Well, I've been correcting the corresponding template (Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, etc.) as I rename the main articles; for instance, I fixed the link for Alphabet City in Template:Manhattan. I guess I overlooked Spanish Harlem, sorry! &mdash;Larry V (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Rusty and Eddie
Can you please try grabbing screens that better resemble the moment of death for Rusty Millio and Eddie Pietro. By this I mean when the bullet is seen ricocheting the window and going into Eddie. Where you can actually see his blood going into the air. You'd have to grab the scene of his execution, the current screens are quite non-explanatory of the scene. They are just sitting in the car. We need to see them actually getting shot. please fix this problem. - Zarbon

i saw your update...excellent. much better than before. if it isn't any trouble for you and if you might have the screen, can you update aunt edie...the pic we need is of eugene's fedex that states her death. - Zarbon

Category:Geminis
Hi, Zimbabweed, you need to remember to complete all the deletion procedures. I already took care of adding the entry to WP:CFD here, so you can add anything else if you want to. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Chamillion
I have no idea what's happened there, I was trying to remove the vandalism done underneath with the phone umber. I'll revert it back! HawkerTyphoon 02:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Comsewogue
Yo, dude thanks for fixing up my Comsewogue article. I needed some help on that. It totally wasn't up to wikipedia article standards. probably cause I wrote it in twenty minutes before school! Thefreakshow 16:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Big L locations
Why isn't Manhattan suitable for a location in the infobox? I can't find that guideline anywhere. Tim Ivorson 2006-06-20


 * Thanks for your reply, Zimbabweed. I don't like the long address format either. My prefered solution is to simply leave it at Harlem, because the Harlem article exists and readers can find out more there. I can see that that might be US-centric (in the case of an American article). "New York City" alone might also be preferable to "Harlem, ..., USA". I was hoping that there was some kind of recorded consensus. In the absense of such a censensus, I wouldn't dream of reverting a reasonable edit. Tim Ivorson 2006-06-22


 * Yes. I see. Tim Ivorson 2006-06-22

Nas - Hip Hop Is Dead
On 12 Jul you added a copyvio to the page Hip Hop Is Dead. However, you did not give a url that you beliveved the article was taken from. Could you please add the url that way we can see if you are correct. If not you should takle the temp off. Thanks --Jaysscholar 19:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks --Jaysscholar 19:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Also... the album has leaked. I don't have a source that says it explicitly, but the fact that people have it means that it has leaked. Why is a source necessary in this instance?

Infobox Town NY Template
I like your NY Town Infobox template and have used it. Thank you for creating it. Would you consider modifying its markup to accommodate using another template that will allow use of this NY map-making image template Template:GBNewYorkState? Jim Dunning 17:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Template:Infobox Town NY
 * Zimbabweed, maybe you can help with this —-- the red dot image for this template is invisible in IE. It displays fine in Firefox, but the Microsoft world refuses to reveal it, so you end up with a NYS map with no red dot. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim Dunning 15:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Great job, Zimbabweed! The red dot works in MSIE. Thank you. I'm interested in knowing what the issue was . . ..
 * Jim Dunning 23:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * lol - we're leaving messages simultaneously! Thanks for the info -- I'll have to read the article on the incompatibility. I suspected as much and quickly tested displaying PNG images in IE, but with no prob (I must check out the specifics). Thanks for taking care of it so quickly -- it makes the "locator" available to many more readers. Jim Dunning 00:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Brookhaven ny seal.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Brookhaven ny seal.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Suffolk_County_ny_seal.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Suffolk_County_ny_seal.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

YTMND logo
Great fix on that, that was good thinking. --Dwiki 16:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Steve Irwin revert
Could you explain, possibly on the article talk page why you made this edit. Thanks, Ans e ll  06:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Syd Thrift.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Syd Thrift.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Aww...
That's the nicest comment anyone's ever left on my talk page. *cries tears of joy* :'( Lmz00 18:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Vince McMahon
Your recent edit to Vince McMahon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Racist
Yall racist man, yall don't let us do what we do, what is a vandilizm? How is making something new vandalizm. Come on, lets be serious. Come on. Yall serious being racist. Just because I'm black and yall white and yall think ya got control? Come on you can't be serious. This ain't your website, you didn't make this website. This website is not yours. You don't host it, you don't make the rules but the boss and I see you ain't want of them. So stop warning me man. Let me do what's best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A Different World (talk • contribs)

Your recent RV to Jay-Z
Hi! Just curious; Naming conventions is a pretty big article. Could you tell me what part of that article covers your revision? I'm not complaining or saying that you are wrong; by any means...I'm just trying to learn reasons for revisions so that I can be a better RC patroller. Thanks! -- Weirdoactor 22:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification! -- Weirdoactor 15:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The Game - Doctor's Advocate
Hi mate. I have noticed you keep changing the release date to Nov 7th but it is November 14th! Did you check my sources? Daza.info

Unspecified source for Image:Bigl image2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigl image2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bigl image2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigl image2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Yamla 18:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

CitiField
I will not change the name back until the groundbreaking ceremony, set for early next week, although it wouldn't surprise me if someone beats me to it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a news service, and until something is official, it is speculation. Milchama 22:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Groundbreaking was today, and the name of the park was announced as Citi Field (two words) not CitiField.  Therefore, the New Mets Ballpark article was incorrectly named over the weekend.  The article should have not been renamed until it was official. Milchama 18:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Nas
You are a faggot. Stop reverting all my changes. Improvements needed to be made, and I made them. I spent about 25 minutes organizing that and I made it look ALOT better. Organization is a good thing, not a bad thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubfan789 (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ron Perelman 2002.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ron Perelman 2002.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

How is a link to a WFAN fan site SPAM as you call it Re Steve Somers
On what grounds do you call my link to a WFAN fan site SPAM, I will try again

Change to Common.css
Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. -- ShakingSpirit talk  on behalf of Kaldari 02:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Brookhaven ny seal.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 12:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

needsource tag
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Xiner (talk, email) 16:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Darrent Williams 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Darrent Williams 2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

I replaced it with a promotional photo, which is better than a news service image froma copyright standpoint. - crz crztalk 20:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MSG_Network_Logo_2006.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:MSG_Network_Logo_2006.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 22:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

RNS - last release
Was curious, do you think maybe it was just a typo, that in fact what they were trying to say is "This is our latest release."? I don't want to jump the gun or anything. --W3stfa11 00:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Nas logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Nas logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 23:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Macys Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Macys Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 23:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:DMX_rapper.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DMX_rapper.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jadakiss_promo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jadakiss_promo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Brookhaven_ny_seal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brookhaven_ny_seal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BJ Talk 03:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Max_Kellerman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Max_Kellerman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

2007 New York Mets season
Hello. I mean no disrespect, but I have a question about some of the edits you have made to this article. The question is regarding the titles of the headings on the sections of these articles. If you look at the other 29 articles, you will see that the headings are listed as "Regular S eason", "Season S tandings", and "Player S tats", with the blue letters being capitalized in all of them (see the 2007 Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim season article for example. Is there any reason why, in the 2007 New York Mets season article you had the above blue letters not capitalized?  Again, I'm just looking for a little clarification on this. Ksy92003 User·talk·contribs
 * Alright. I have looked at Manual of Style (headings) and do agree with you.  I reverted those edits on 2007 New York Mets season because the other seasons had the headings capitalized so I thought we should try to keep it balanced, but that was before I read the policy.  Later today, I will try to make those changes on the other articles to lower-case the headings.  But now, I have another couple questions.  Why did you do this to the 2007 New York Mets season, and why didn't you do it to the other ones? Ksy92003 User·talk·contribs
 * Okay. I have made all the necessary changes for the 14 articles on teams in the American League, and if they haven't been done already, I will work on the National League teams' articles. Ksy92003 User·talk·contribs

Press inquiry
Hi Zimbabweed,

I'm a reporter with the LA Times doing a piece on wikipedia, in particular about the folks that rose up upon Anna Nicole Smith's death and updated and maintained her page. Would love to hear about your experience if you had a few seconds this weekend. You can contact me by email at richard.rushfield@latimes.com or on AIM at richardrushfield.

Very best, Richard —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richardrushfield (talk • contribs) 00:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Jada-kiss-of-death.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jada-kiss-of-death.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chrisette_Michele_promo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chrisette_Michele_promo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Villages as Political Subdivisions of Suffolk County
See the Template:Westchester_County,_New_York, Orange County, NY and also most of the County Templates in New Jersey.

Also, the Administrative Divisions of New York page states this:

"Villages often cross other political boundaries. More than 70 villages are located in two or more towns. Seven villages are divided between two counties. The village of Saranac Lake is in three towns and two counties.

A village in New York State is comparable to a town in certain other states, or a boro(ugh) in certain other states. Villages in New York State are classified by the Census Bureau as incorporated places."

Jjvcfi 02:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Based on the above, I respectfully request that you revert Template:SuffolkCountyNY to include the list of village links - I am trying to make it consistent with other County entries in Wikipedia (Besides, it took about 45 minutes to put together!)  Thanks.

Jjvcfi 17:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Alfpogformnj4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alfpogformnj4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me sir!
You revert my greeting. I very sad now. I sorry if this allowed not inside Wikipedia. Again sorry sir. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.176.92.59 (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
 * All your base are belong to us. :) Anyhow, "this country is in a state of emergency?" While you have an American flag upside-down, the same could refer to Zimbabwe. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 16:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Nypdpatch2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nypdpatch2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please vote
See Template talk:Infobox NFL player. —Bender235 18:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:Nas
About your message regarding Template:Nas: I was just only re-formatting the the template to match other rap templates. 63.3.21.1 04:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really matter. As long as it's a template, it works. 63.3.21.1 04:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, sorry, this is really really late, first time I've had time to log in for months. In response to your question I moved it back based on this discussion from my talk page.Also from the logs User:Kelly Martin moved it based on how it is printed on the album. The Genesis 02:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:2007 Triple Crown of Thoroughbread Racing
A tag has been placed on Category:2007 Triple Crown of Thoroughbread Racing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

1)misspelled, 2)unnecessary cat

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this or at WikiProject Thoroughbred racing. Thanx --- Handicapper 20:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Big L promo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Big L promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Jadakiss
With regard to the infobox, please see the WikiProject for the appropraite formatt. With regard to your other edits: some need sources or at least explanation) (why did you remove all the alternative names, for example?), some are inaccurate, and some introduce non-WikiProject and unnecessary HTML. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 08:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:IO Digital Cable.gif
Hello, Zimbabweed. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:IO Digital Cable.gif) was found at the following location: User:Zimbabweed/sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fsn hd.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn hd.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 21:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Fsn hd.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn hd.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 21:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Norman Riley
Hi, I removed the speedy tag you placed on this page. As a professor at a university, there seems to be a bare minimum prima facie case for notability, and I have added his university page as a reference. If you think the article is still insufficiently notable to be included, WP:AFD is always there for you. Thanks! Johnleemk | Talk 08:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

R. Kelly's Double Up
1) Irrelevant that in 2007 an album leaks? 2) The rest of the article is unsourced too.

Fair use rationale for Image:Big-l-the-archives.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Big-l-the-archives.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 19:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fsn hd.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fsn hd.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Amerikaz-Nightmare.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Amerikaz-Nightmare.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Big-l-lifestylez-album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Big-l-lifestylez-album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Big-l-big-picture-album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Big-l-big-picture-album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cablevision Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Cablevision Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Newsdayfront.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Newsdayfront.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nastradamus single.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nastradamus single.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jin-I Promise.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jin-I Promise.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Its dark and hell is hot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Its dark and hell is hot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hip Hop Is Dead CDS.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hip Hop Is Dead CDS.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sny-hd.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Sny-hd.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Styles P promo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Styles P promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:ESPN_the_Magazine.png
I have tagged Image:ESPN_the_Magazine.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 13:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Analyze This vinyl.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Analyze This vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:What About Bob.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:What About Bob.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Sportsnet newyork.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Sportsnet newyork.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 76.180.29.38 03:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bo_Schembechler_promo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Bo_Schembechler_promo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 02:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)