User talk:Zimmbotkiller

When you write an article, like North Dakota Highway 57, please add more than an infobox, or it may be deleted. Thank you. --NE2 12:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much; I removed the context tag. --NE2 01:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You've done it again, with North Dakota Highway 15. Please add some text. --NE2 06:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  04:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lake Region Radio/DL
A tag has been placed on Template:Lake Region Radio/DL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Lake Region Radio/Surrounding areas
A tag has been placed on Template:Lake Region Radio/Surrounding areas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Milty (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Milty (talk) 01:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. -- azumanga (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- azumanga (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KDAK3.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:KDAK3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KDAK4.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:KDAK4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:0816_H15M33_CH12.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:0816_H15M33_CH12.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 06:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:KDAK2.jpg
I have tagged Image:KDAK2.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

KCPM TV
Please contact the owners of KCPM tv, with regards to your posts. KCPM TV Is in fact still in business, and is not defunct as you posted. Corrections have been made.

They can be contacted at the addressed business locations for KCPO, and or KCPM. Thanks --Jsprince (talk) 23:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of a template redirect
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 14:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Unnecessary Sirius XM Channels Template
I have marked the Template:Sirius XM Channels with the Speedy Delete template 15:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC). The templates that use to make up the major template that you have created do the same job without the major template and makes the viewing easier. TravKoolBreeze (talk) 15:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

List of DirecTV channels
Thank you for your contributions to List of DirecTV channels. They were good edits, and it is very appreciated! --Son (talk) 05:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

KVLY-TV and KXJB-TV
The FCC database shows both stations use the -TV tag, not the -DT tag, so there was no need to move the articles to KVLY-DT and KXJB-DT, respectively. I acknowledge both are broadcasting digital-only since February 16, 2009.-- milk the  cows  (Talk) 00:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

List of DirecTV channels - future channels
Please be advised that internet forums such as dbstalk.com are considered unreliable self published sources and are generally not allowed. TomCat4680 (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi Zimm,

I'm not sure why you're removing religious broadcast networks from the broadcast television templates. I've reverted those changes for now. An edit summary would be useful; it helps other editors understand the intention of your edit. Firsfron of Ronchester 16:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Defunct NE TV
Template:Defunct NE TV has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. azumanga (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Facebook_Abuse.png
I have tagged File:Facebook_Abuse.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Facebook Abuse.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Facebook Abuse.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. The Wordsmith Communicate 17:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of List of DirecTV channels (United States) 101.0°W
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. &oelig; &trade; 10:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hate group about Michael Jackson.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Hate group about Michael Jackson.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Facebook windows vista search results.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Facebook windows vista search results.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Facebook Michael Vick search results.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Facebook Michael Vick search results.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hate group about Michael Phelps.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Hate group about Michael Phelps.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

username
Has anyone challenged your username yet? Our username policy says not to have a username that suggests your a bot but I'm not sure that applies to your name so much. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As far as I know that applies only to user names ending in "bot", which is not so in this case. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of Dish Network channels 8000–8099. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of DirecTV channels 300–399 (United States)


The article List of DirecTV channels 300–399 (United States) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * this is not a directory

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 08:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of DirecTV channels 300–399 (United States)
I have nominated List of DirecTV channels 300–399 (United States), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels 300–399 (United States). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 08:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

FSN affiliate renames
Please be advised I have reverted the renames of the FSN affiliates you did. Per WP:MOSTM, since they're not acronyms they shouldn't be in all capitals. Also they're all still spoken as "Fox Sports (region)" and their website addresses are written as such. TomCat4680 (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Grace City Road
I have nominated Grace City Road, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Grace City Road. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Imzadi  1979   →   01:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:CSD of User talk:Hypocritepedia
Hello, I'm not sure what you were getting at on User talk:Hypocritepedia. They did not create the page; did. Anyways, user talk pages are usually kept for historical reasons. Regards, Airplaneman   ✈  04:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a similar opinion with regard to User talk:Dingbat1993. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:SuperSonicSpeed/Archive for an MFD in which the consensus was that user talk pages of banned users should not be deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

ANI thread
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Grand master  ka  20:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox malware software
A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox malware software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of county routes in Eddy County, North Dakota


The article List of county routes in Eddy County, North Dakota has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rschen7754 06:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dish Network Links
Template:Dish Network Links has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fuckedbook


A tag has been placed on Fuckedbook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

An attack redirect that is also implausible

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Free  Wales Now!   what did I screw up?   15:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Fuckedbook listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fuckedbook. Since you had some involvement with the Fuckedbook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SmartSE (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of United States cable and satellite television networks (defunct)
Template:List of United States cable and satellite television networks (defunct) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

"Trolling Trolls Trolling" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trolling Trolls Trolling. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Not a very active user (talk) 09:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)