User talk:Zinedine Socrates

"Hyper" links
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia, Zinedine Socrates! You might try TWO square brackets at each end, such as UVA instead of just one at each end. Be careful that you don't link to disambiguation pages, though, because that's a no-no in articles. – Paine EllsworthC LIMAX ! 22:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, – Paine EllsworthC LIMAX ! 22:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bayer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jytdog (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I cited it, what have you given me this warning for? Zinedine Socrates (talk) 20:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * hi! you are getting to learn Wikipedia. i opened a discussion at the article talk page and see that you already replied there.. we'll discuss the issues there. Jytdog (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * you are also getting an introduction to the ugly kinds of things that can happen on article talk pages. Per WP:TPG, article talk pages are for discussing article content.  When you find people talking about other editors on an article Talk page, it is bad behavior - some dispute happened somewhere else or some other time, and the person doing that has personalized it.  it happens. :(  Jytdog (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks in any case for starting a discussion of the lead. that led to its expansion - it was too short.  so thanks!  good luck here. Jytdog (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)