User talk:Zinnoberrot

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

European State Aid Law Quarterly
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of European State Aid Law Quarterly, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lexxion.de/en/zeitschriften/fachzeitschriften-englisch/estal.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

European Food and Feed Law Review
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of European Food and Feed Law Review, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lexxion.de/en/zeitschriften/fachzeitschriften-englisch/effl.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 11:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Carbon and Climate Law Review
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Carbon and Climate Law Review, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lexxion.de/zeitschriften/fachzeitschriften-englisch/cclr.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Journal of Renewable Energy Law and Policy
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Journal of Renewable Energy Law and Policy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lexxion.de/en/relp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Well, copyright is a bit of a problem, so please read the following carefully: Requesting copyright permission. And concerning interwikilinks, see Help:Interwiki.

Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of European Journal of Risk Regulation


A tag has been placed on European Journal of Risk Regulation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Randykitty (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carbon and Climate Law Review


A tag has been placed on Carbon and Climate Law Review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Randykitty (talk) 22:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of European Food and Feed Law Review


A tag has been placed on European Food and Feed Law Review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of Renewable Energy Law and Policy


A tag has been placed on Journal of Renewable Energy Law and Policy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 22:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of European State Aid Law Quarterly


A tag has been placed on European State Aid Law Quarterly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 22:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Explanation
As reviewing administrator,  I deleted the articles, both for being copyvios and being entirely promotional.

First, it's a copyright violation. Even if you own the copyright you must give us a license according to  the full formal details at WP:DCM, -- and please note that this must be more than permission to publish, but a donation by the copyright owner of a license   under the CC-BY-SA  and the GNU  licenses, as explained in WP:COPYRIGHT,  which  give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and alter the material, even for commercial purposes.

But this is not advised, because normally the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. It is better to rewrite.) The material, in fact, was entirely promotional puffery: saying that the journal is the leading journal is meaningless, unless it is documented by reliable third party sources. Giving its editorial policy is relevant, but not if it consists of a statement of how important the subject is. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective contributors or subscribers --that sort of content is considered promotional.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know

In addition, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. For academic journals, the necessary information usually isconsidered to be the list of major selective indexes services in the field that index it.

Based on what is generally accepted here, an article about a journal should  contain:
 * 1) Full titles, any earlier titles, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
 * 2) Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
 * 3) publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
 * 4) availability on line
 * 5) no. of articles published a year
 * 6) ISSNs for both print and online versions
 * 7) Online availability of current and earlier issues
 * 8) Open access availability, if relevant.
 * 9) Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
 * 10) coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index)
 * 11) latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
 * 12) any actual references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
 * 13) a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science or the equivalent.
 * 14) External links to the journal's main web site, and, if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.
 * 15) The name and affiliation of the editor in chief, and all previous editor-in chief, with dates. ; since being the editor of a major journal is considered notable, an article can also be written about them. But we do not include other staff, or the editorial board.

It should not contain
 * 1) General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
 * 2) Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
 * 3) A list of those on the editorial board
 * 4) names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
 * 5) Information about subscription prices
 * 6) Information about how to submit articles
 * 7) Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
 * and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

Please read  our FAQ  about  organisations, and articles like this, and for more specific information our  WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using   the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there  to prose.