User talk:Zippybonzo/Training/NPP/Begocc

 Notability in a nutshell Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large outlets are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller ones can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations, nor should they be used to provide blanket permissions for all articles about a certain subject. See WP:NMEDIA - while the material is used for media notability, the message covers a much broader area for reviewers to consider, and why I made it the masthead.

Welcome New Trainee!

Instructions:, below is a quote from the lead at New pages patrol/School that I want you to consider: "If you are looking to contribute to Wikipedia but do not intend to remain active on New Page Review, then this program is probably not for you. Users who are less experienced, but who would still like to help maintain the quality of the encyclopedia, might like to consider Patrolling Vandalism instead – an essential function that requires less knowledge of Notability and Deletion policy, although such knowledge is highly recommended. For training on Counter vandalism, see WP:CVUA."



If you still wish to proceed with training, your first exercise is to review the curation tool video in the right margin, and also review NPP Tutorial. Become familiar with the flowcharts and curation tool as some of that information will come into play during the Q&A session. If you have any questions after you've read the tutorial and have a basic understanding of the page curation tool, please ping me from your session page. You cannot possibly over-ping me.

Part of the training will involve your participation in a few live NPP reviews that I will assign. You are also expected to read and learn the relative WP:PAGs as presented in the 5 subsections below. You will provide a summary, in your own words, of what you've learned including what you consider to be the most important aspects of each. You will complete one section at a time in the order presented, and ping me after you complete each part so we can discuss your responses or any questions you may have before proceeding to the next part. Please be mindful of the formatting.

Your reactions and behavior are also part of the exam. Keep in mind that WP has no deadlines, so you may work at a comfortable pace. Oh, and here is a suggestion you should consider before you begin. At the bottom of this page is a tip section which is worth reviewing because there are some handy scripts you can add to your user common.js that may prove quite helpful for editing, and reviewing articles.

It may seem overwhelming at first but in comparison to the work we do at NPP, this training exercise is a drop in the bucket. NPP is not a cakewalk and has been referred to as a step toward becoming an administrator. Don't hesitate to ask questions - and remember, the only stupid question is the one you didn't ask. Good luck!!

Notability (Pt. 1)

 * Notability


 * General Notability Guideline (GNG)


 * Specific Notability Guidelines (SNG)


 * Organizational and Company Notability and any other SNGs that relate to areas of patrol interest


 * WP:RS


 * Relative to your work as a NPP reviewer, what initial steps would you take upon arriving at an article to be reviewed?

Wikipedia policy and guidelines (Pt. 2)

 * Assume good faith


 * Biographies of living people


 * Conflicts of interest (including undisclosed paid editing)


 * Copyright


 * Hoaxes


 * Attack pages

Communications (Pt. 3)
This section is relative to New pages patrol. Also see New pages patrol.


 * Discussions with creators of new pages


 * Template notifications vs manually notification/discussion


 * Tone, clarity, and knowledge in discussions


 * Wikilove/positive comments


 * Warning templates

Deletion (Pt. 4)

 * Articles for Deletion


 * BEFORE nominating


 * PROD and BLPPROD


 * WP:Soft delete


 * WP:SOFTSP


 * Speedy Deletion

Reviewing Procedures (Pt. 5)

 * Improvement Tagging


 * Categorizing

NPP Exercise
Before you begin, read the Notability in a nutshell banner at the top of this page, study it and think hard about the message it is sending. Read it again. If you are certain about your review re: the articles in this trial, '' please do not hesitate to take action as you would normally do as a bona fide patroller. ''

I will list/have listed 5 articles for you to review. Below each one, provide a succinct summary of your review beginning with (a) what you looked for first, (b) what issues you found, if any, (c) what actions you would have taken/did take, and (d) why you chose that particular action. The articles I've chosen are unreviewed, but it is possible they will have been reviewed by the time you get to them, so it is crucial to begin your reviews as quickly as possible. Feel free to tag, copy edit and/or find & cite sources as necessary - take action as you would if you were reviewing them for NPP.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Evaluation
Once I have completed the evaluation and you have passed the course, you may apply for NPP user rights at Requests for permissions/New page reviewer, and add a link to this review.

Tips & scripts

 * User:Bradv/Scripts/Superlinks - very useful tool – it adds a small linked menu bar on the top right side of article pages as follows: [ History * Log * Filter * Talk Page * Notice * NPP Flowchart ]
 * User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft – important script that is used to WP:DRAFTIFY articles (move to draft space), including cleanup and author notification.
 * New pages patrol is the foundation on which we operate. Add the link to your bookmarks menu for easy access.
 * User:SuperHamster/CiteUnseen.js - a very useful tool and easy to install. The script prepends a small icon to each citation in the Reference section indicating the grading and type of source; most are in sync with WP:RSP.
 * User:Headbomb/unreliable – another somewhat useful tool that grades sources using highlight colors –
 * User:Evad37/duplinks-alt - highlights duplicate wikilinks. We should only wikilink once, sometimes twice if wikilinked in the lead and again further enough down in the article that it would prove useful. When reviewing, you can quickly find and eliminate wikilink overkill.

NPP Forums

 * WT:New pages patrol/Reviewers
 * Discord - where the NPP team hangs out.

Userbox
This userbox may only be displayed if you graduate.

questions
I read this page, and most of New pages patrol, and i have some questions, like did the curation tool change? Begocci (talk) 10:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Begocc no it's the same tool just with a slightly modernised look. Zippybonzo &#124; talk  &#124;  contribs  (she/they) 11:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

@Zippybonzo almost forgot to ping Begocci (talk) 11:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Begocc are you going to start part 1? Zippybonzo &#124; talk  &#124;  contribs  (she/they) 16:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ive read most of part one, but still haven't finished it :) Begocci (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Begocc don't forget you need to summarise them on the page. Zippybonzo &#124; talk  &#124;  contribs  (she/they) 11:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)