User talk:Zipupyourcuunt

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Zipupyourcuunt", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because offensive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Andre🚐 04:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/June Parker. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 06:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I have fixed your unblock request for you, as you had placed it inside the example request. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 06:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

I mean I really do not understand how I'm being banned for editing a single page with historical information. admin who banned me has more of a problem with the content of my edits. sad that a supposedly neutral website targets people who are new and not a part of the correct demographic.

"but there is in any case clear intent to disrupt when one registers with that username and reverts someone on one's first edit" how is this admin not bad faith? it was reverted to add more information and make the page more neutral instead of a completely one sided bias

what is disruptive about trying to create a more relevant page...? extremely bad faith admin that cannot see past her own bias and clearly has a problem with newer users.

The user that I'm being framed as had the same sockpuppet ban for some other random account that wasn't even theirs also from the same admin conveniently, seems it is more about controlling narratives on wikipedia than fostering a neutral and informative website.

Immediate edit to the 1804 Haiti Massacre after my ban ;(Restored revision 1112466604 by Antiok 1pie (talk): Rv unconstructive changes from blocked user) is this how wikipedia works? Perma banned for trying to contextualize and clarify a historic event and my edits are immediately censored and deleted as "unconstructive"?

the 1804 Haiti Massacre page is extremely bias, it is not neutral in the slightest and is constantly edited to demean Haitians as savages and "anti-white", wikipedia has fostered a home for people who violently hate Blacks and it shows in pages like this