User talk:Zjhjeremy/Evaluate an Article

Hi, nice job on your article evaluation. You did a resaonable job briefly addressing most of the major aspects of the article. That said, I think there were some aspects of the article that you could have additionally addressed, namely:
 * Did any of external links in the article not work?
 * Did the article have a neutral point of view and include diverse perspectives?
 * Is the content up to date?
 * Did the images all have appropriate captions?
 * Was the content of the article consistently supported by reliable sources?

I suggest that you revisit your evaluation to make sure you understand the key aspects that define a good Wikipedia article. This is important to help you easily find ways to improve the article you chose to develop.

I also have some serious concerns about the suitability of this article for the midterm project. My concern is mainly that Shiba Inu is already a pretty well-developed article, having reached WP:B-class. I think it can be pretty difficult for new editors to improve an article like this, as it will typically have a relatively thorough coverage of the most important information about the subject. Essentially, it could be a problem to find new sources that contain enough new information that you can add. Frankly, my guess is that the easier way forward will probably be to find a new article that is less developed (e.g., an article that's start or stub class), and I strongly encourage you to find a new article.

If you really want to commit to this article, that's okay, but there's certainly a risk that you'll struggle to make a substantive contribution to it. If you take this route I would urge you to get started right away to search for reliable sources for information that you can add, ideally in a new section.

Please don't hesitate to reach out to me, either here on Wikipedia or on our Discord server if you have any questions or want some help deciding Groceryheist (talk) 07:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)