User talk:Zkmonika

Welcome
 Hello, Zkmonika, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Zkmonika, good luck, and have fun. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA review of Percivall Pott
Zkmonika, as a brand new editor on Wikipedia, I'm afraid you simply do not have the experience nor the understanding of how Wikipedia works to be reviewing an article that has been proposed for Good Article status. Indeed, the "review" you wrote demonstrates that you do not know how to apply or judge by the Good Article criteria, since the article fails to meet several of them. We have had to undo your actions, so the article is once again available for an experienced reviewer.

While we hope you will be contributing to improving or creating articles here, and appreciate your enthusiasm, we will have to ask you to refrain from doing any further reviewing until you have been here for a few months and have made several hundred edits here at least; even better, that you have shepherded some of your own nominations through the process so you understand what is involved from a creator's perspective. Thank you for your understanding. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)