User talk:Zlassiter

Notable Individuals
When someone reverts your edits, look at the reason why — it was provided by myself *twice*. The notability policy for the page was established at the creation of the page. If you don’t agree with the policy, take it to the talk page. — Andy Anderson 05:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pratik Chougule


A tag has been placed on Pratik Chougule, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Booyahhayoob (talk) 06:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Notability
Please look at WP:WTAF. It is a well accepted essay on what WP:NOTABLE is about. Accordingly, when we do not see a WP article about a particular subject editors generally reject citations which do not refer to WP:NOTABLE persons or sources. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Have you edited WP before?
You are a bit WP:PRECOCIOUS. Am I wrong? – S. Rich (talk) 06:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Your recent editing history at List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''This isn't an issue of vanalism, it's an editing dispute. Discuss your content changes on the talk -- do not edit war further, otherwise you'll find yourself here. Best,'' —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 07:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)