User talk:Zlatno Pile

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! | Uncle Milty  |  talk  |  19:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fair use rationale for File:BGC OVA.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BGC OVA.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Hopper
Being buried at a catholic burial doesn't assert any commitment from him, please cite and add content to the body of the article to give the cat context and support. Off2riorob (talk) 16:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

The guidelines for cats and religious cats assert that we don't just add them willy nilly we take care not to misrepresent and as such there is not content ion the article that asserts he was a religious person or that he commented on his religious feeling and such. Off2riorob (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jesus has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Sex
Well done! I feel embarrassed to have read that article and not spotted that error. Excellent work, if there's anything I can help with, feel free to let me know. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Poison (Final Fight)
Thanks for the note! I am not sure which is actually correct, sex or gender. Is there a source which indicates the subject's sex is disputed, rather than the subject's gender? The best bet in these sort of content disputes is to track down sources which support your position and discuss it on the article talk page. Hope this helps, --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:BGC OVA.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BGC OVA.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion needs your voice
You are invited to participate in the Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axelode (talk • contribs) 22:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maggie Han, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Maggie_Han check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Maggie_Han?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Amber Smith
Hi. Thank you for adding a source-supported bit of information on Amber Smith's height to her Wikipedia article, as it genuinely improves the article's quality. However, other portions of your recent edits to the article, for the following reasons:


 * The birth date you added to the article was not accompanied by a supportive citation. I know you don't edit here that often, and have only accumulated less than 400 edits since 2009, but I assume you understand that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, as underscored by the fact that you included a citation or Smith's height.
 * Social media sites should not be added to the External links sections of a subject's article, as indicated by WP:ELNO.

If you ever need to contact me, you can leave a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)