User talk:Zlio2004

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohanji


A tag has been placed on Mohanji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Singularity42 (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mohanji, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 23:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Mohanji has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -Scottywong | spout _ 23:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohanji


A tag has been placed on Mohanji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohanji


A tag has been placed on Mohanji, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wer900 • talk • coordinationconsensus defined 00:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohanji


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Mohanji, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 06:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 (2)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Mohanji. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Singularity42 (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Singularity42, Can you please help me out to improve my article. Why is it getting deleted? Zlio2004 (talk) 11:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Zlio2004


 * It is getting deleted for a number of reasons:
 * Large parts of it are copied and pasted from the subject's own website. Other times, it is a close paraphrase.  Wikipedia cannot use copyrighted materials.  It does not matter whether you have permission to use it.  Special licenses are required for Wikipedia to use it.  For more information, see WP:DCM.
 * It does not appear that this person is notable (which has a very specific definition for Wikipedia policies). A person must must be covered by multiple, independent reliable sources.  See WP:42 and WP:BIO for more information.
 * It is not a neutral coverage of the subject, and therefore comes across as advertising. See WP:NPOV for more information.
 * Unless the above issues can be addressed, the article will be not stay on Wikipedia. Singularity42 (talk) 13:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Mohanji
Heads up - I've raised concerns with the notability and references you have used in the new version of the Mohanji references. Right now, the references given in the article are either not independent (they are his own website, or the website of his charity) or not reliable (blogs and other self-publishing websites). If the issue is not addressed soon, I will nominate the article for a community discussion to see whether it should be kept. For more information, please read WP:Reliable sources, WP:Notability, and WP:BIO. Singularity42 (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

AFD
Brought it up for discussion at the following link Articles for deletion/MohanjiTheRingess (talk) 17:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Can you please find more sources from newspapers, mainly from,(on activities of Ammu charitable trust) Yes Rayabhari, I will try and find more sources on Ammucare. Thank you. Zlio2004 (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Zlio2004
 * Times of India
 * The Hindu
 * The Indian Express? Thank you-Rayabhari (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Can't find more sources. I have to ask for speedy deletion until I can collect more sources in near future. Thank you for all the efforts Rayabhari.