User talk:Zmaj~enwiki/Archive 1

Please, be careful when you edit articles like Ivan Gundulic without any explaination. HolyRomanEmperor 14:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Please, be careful when you edit articles like Ivan Gundulic without any explaination. HolyRomanEmperor 14:24, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop vandalising Ruđer Bošković and other articles... HolyRomanEmperor 14:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Excuse me? We have already discussed the subject. With all due your respect, you are the one who is adding incorrect info. You should view the talk pages and read the whole article before making false changes. Your changes will be reverted. HolyRomanEmperor 18:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The Croatian name in Rudjer Boskovic is irrelevant, for instance (as he had nothing whatsoever with Croatia or Croats at the time) HolyRomanEmperor 18:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

You deleted important info on Ethnic cleansing article as well. Why? Your recent changes sound like you are planning to spread Greater Croatian propaganda. HolyRomanEmperor 18:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Please, explain what do Ruđer and Ivan have anything to do with Croatdom? HolyRomanEmperor 18:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree with your statement. There are far less believers of Rudjer's mythic Croatian ethnicity, so we're going to remove it completly :) Thanks! HolyRomanEmperor 14:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Should we also delete that Penkala is half-Pole half-Dutch (most consider him a Croat)? HolyRomanEmperor 15:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

And Ivo Andrić being a Croat (most consider him a Serb)? HolyRomanEmperor 15:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

And Ivo Andrić being a Croat (most consider him a Serb)? HolyRomanEmperor 15:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree. But like you said, it's Jimbo Wales law; how was it: regardless of whether it's true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not I hope that you now realised that that cannot be applied to our case(s) A truce? HolyRomanEmperor 16:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Now, I want to hear your side of the story (you've heard mine) Why should we name Rudjer (and Ivan) Croatian (and not Serbian when we're already naming him Croatian)? HolyRomanEmperor 16:57, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Why are you making such a noise on Rudjer Boskovic? I suggest that we solve all disputes on our (mine and yours) talk pages. HolyRomanEmperor 17:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 13:49, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

As you wish. HolyRomanEmperor 11:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Tagging people as vandals
You should read what is the definition of vandalism on wikipedia. Tagging people vandals for inserting edits that you disagree with in bad-faith summary is slander and personal attack. It is clearly against the EXPLICTLY STATED policies here. Bzezen 10:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Objectivity
Although I do not simpathize with the huge atrocities committed by the Ustashas in Jasenovac and elsewhere, or the Partisans in Bleiburg; or the RS soldiers in Srebrenica, Arkan's forces in Slavonia and Kosovo or Glavas and Gotovina and their crimes of war; it is sometimes necessary to wear the cloakes of even the worst scum of the earth to write NPOV things. That is the price of objectivity. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Translation to english
hi, I'm sorry, do you by any change know what this means? : tvoj sej pristik letac, moj stepiknak udrok bog duvrok casti,gospodina . --Cosmic girl 15:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Answered on Reference_desk/Language. --Zmaj 12:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

The Lika misunderstanding
I think that it's better if we discuss the matter here. If ever Serbs be allowed/decide to return to Lika, they would form a majority again. So it counts if we count all the refugees. Some will probably return, making it a clear mix of Croats and Serbs.

If you feel strictly opposed to it, we could put The historical population of Lika is a mix of Croats and Serbs, but it rather doesn't show anywhere that AFAIC, the majority of residents in Lika lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, Australia and Canada. How else do they have cities majorly Croatian but with Serbian mayors and national assemblies (those outside voted).

I will not act without thy further instructions. Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 10:22, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * More than possible, my friend! :) I'll presume that you can handle it? Thanks in advance! Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 12:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Molise Croatian dialect
Just to inform you that the article was created and to a large extent maintained by User:Luka Jačov, who is probably a Croat, but has a Serbo-Croatian-pushing POV. I don't mind it to be under "Molise Croatian" name, quite the opposite, as the people's origin, faith and likely self-identification is to a large extent Croatian. I'm saying this mostly because of your edit summaries, which I find, erm, cynical. Also, I have to note that the proper way to move the article names is via WP:RM and to reach a WP:Consensus, and that the move wasn't discussed (yes, I would have voted for it if I had been asked). Good luck in foreseen edit war with Luka. Regards, Duja 14:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

One more thing
Now, I know that we've had a rather bad start, but I wish that we don't look back at it, now that I noticed that you're a supporter of wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. I promise that I will be much more careful in the future. Once again I ask you not to resort to first impression and invite you to resolve with me any dispute on any article that needs taking kare. I'm a little afraid of how might characterize me because of my edits on the southern dalmatian islands. As I see, we could now improve the Pagania article. No? Regards. --HolyRomanEmperor 21:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Dobra vecer. :)

 * I sent an e-mail to Mundimitar.it's owner. Outside of that, I don't know what to do.  --VKokielov 15:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hvala! --VKokielov 15:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Dragi Zmaj,

Eto sto pise u ruskoj knjizi "Slavianskie literaturnye mikrojazyki":

"Etnonim v italianskoj jazykovoj forme tipa Slavi, v dialektnom vide takzhe Schiavuni, Scavuni, Sklavuni; etnonimy horvaty ili serby zdes ne ispoljzujutsja, hotja v svjazi s uchastivshimisja kontaktami s Horvatijej v nauchnoj literature upotrebljajutsja terminy milizanskk/moliski Hrvat i sootvetstvenno lingvonim molizanski jezik. Sami molizanskie slavjane ispoljzujut vyrazenie "govorit na nasu/po nasu".

Knjiga je A. A. Duulichenko, Tartu 2003.

Eto moj prijevod. Pitaj Elephantusa za jos jedan ako si zelio.

"Etnonim u taljanskom jeste 'Slavi', dok u dialektima i 'Schiavun', ...; etnonimi Hrvat ili Srbin se ovdje ne koriste, premda zbog ustanovlenih (pocestalih) veza s Hrvatskom, u znanstvu se upotreblja naziv "molizanski / moliski Hrvat", i odgovarajuci lingvonim "moliski / molizanski jezik". Sami molizanci kazu "govorit na nasu/po nasu" "

Ako sam hoces, promjeni nazad -- a ja cu nastavit edit war s Lukom.

:)
Glad to hear it.

Let me (advertise :) show you some of my largest contributions, then: Stephen II Kotromanić and Duklja.

I will be able to make a brief summary to introduce you to the historical disputes of southern Dalmatian lands if you want. So far, I am the only one that has been editing it, and it appears that only User:Thewanderer has a lot of information on it too. It doesn't matter if you're an expert or a laik, but anything that you can throw could be useful. So, wadda you say?

Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 20:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)