User talk:Zman19964

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Zman19964, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Demagogue seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 01:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Social democracy =/= Democratic socialism
Just to clarify some things on the Justice Democrats page...

-- Firestar493 / Nightstar648 02:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Seriously, why do you keep insisting on democratic socialism when that's NOT what JD is? -- Firestar493 / Nightstar648 19:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
[[

Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Justice Democrats, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Uranium
I reverted your addition to uranium as you put the sentence into the history section, where it didn't really fit.JSR (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Justice Democrats
Hello, I've undone your reversion of my edits to Justice Democrats because they reduced the neutrality of the article and misrepresented JD as a "faction" of the Democratic Party when it is actually a PAC. Additionally, it restored a bulleted point list that was copied directly from JD's website and was thus a copyright violation. I can respect your obvious enthusiasm for the organization... but we need to channel our energy into making this the best article it can be rather than a promo piece. RA 0808 talkcontribs 18:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, United States occupation of Honduras


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United States occupation of Honduras. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – History of Honduras. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Honduras – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HapHaxion (talk) 03:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The issue here is that we already have an article which discusses this topic elsewhere. Wikipedia doesn't like having multiple articles about the same thing - it makes them harder to maintain, for example. That doesn't mean that this topic can't have a standalone article, but if we want to start one it would need to be done by splitting off the existing article. This happens quite often when a page gets too long.  Hut 8.5  21:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm AJFU. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miss Me Yet?, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AJFU (talk) 04:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2017 United States-Saudi Arabia arms deal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm AlexanderLevian. I noticed that you recently removed content from Blue Dog Coalition without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alexander Levian (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that in this edit to Strongman (politics), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arnold Phillip Shortman
A tag has been placed on Arnold Phillip Shortman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Francesca Marie Smith


A tag has been placed on Francesca Marie Smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hummerrocket  (talk)  14:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Francesca Marie Smith


The article Francesca Marie Smith has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Optimist on the run (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Removing cited content from US political coalitions
Your most recent edits removed well cited content from the articles on several US political coalitions, apparently to make the articles conform to your own views of the coalition. We don't do that, we go by what Reliable sources say, not what our own opinions are. --GRuban (talk) 01:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

History of the Republican Party (United States)
Hello, I'm Vacant0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to History of the Republican Party (United States) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Vacant0 (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Toa Nidhiki05 10:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * How am I being disruptive? I’m just updating articles to make them more accurate. Zman19964 (UTC) 2:15 21, April, 2021

Nomination of North Dakota Nonpartisan League for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Dakota Nonpartisan League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/North Dakota Nonpartisan League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curbon7 (talk) 01:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Noting that this is a proposed merge into Nonpartisan League. Curbon7 (talk) 01:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Contentious topics - American politics
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)