User talk:Zmbro/Born in the U.S.A.

Collaboration space

 * Heylin did at least two books that covered all of Springsteen's songs: Song by Song and E Street Shuffle: The Glory Days of Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band. On page 480 of E Street Shuffle: The Glory Days of Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band Heylin mentions the January 1982 recording of "Cover Me" (famously initially recorded to give Donna Summers) but says he re-recorded the song in May 1982, and it was this latter recording that was used for BITUSA. I don't seem to be able to get access to the relevant part of the book in Internet Archive anymore. Also I don't have access to Song by Song, which another editor has used as a source for saying the January recording was used. Some other writers seem to assume the BITUSA "Cover Me" was the one recorded in January, though I'm not sure if anyone explicitly says so. I couldn't find the relevant bits of either book in Google Books or in the sample in Amazon. Maybe I'll need to borrow the books from my local library. We should also keep our eyes out for how explicitly other authors may or may not say the January recording was the one. Depending on what they say, we could either treat Heylin as authoritative or acknowledge the different accounts. –Moisepj

General thoughts

 * I don't think we should be so dead set on exact recording dates. Maybe we can have them to start but once everything is put together if they are too distracting we can be more general. I say this because I was told too many specific dates could be a problem during the FACs for The Next Day and This Year's Model. Just something to keep in mind. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have sometimes done this and sometimes haven't (so far not with Springsteen), but should we include music and lyric info about the outtakes and B-sides? Or is that too much? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * How in-depth should Steven Van Zandt's departure from the E Street Band be delved into? It obviously worth a mention, as both "No Surrender" and "Bobby Jean" are about him, but the question is...how in depth? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I really like this quote that you've included: "By [1983], I'd recorded a lot of music (see Disc three of Tracks). But in the end, I circled back to my original groups of songs. There I found a naturalism and aliveness that couldn't be argued with. They weren't exactly what I'd been looking for, but they were what I had." Moisejp (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe we can find a way to tie that quote together with "I put a lot of pressure on myself over a long period of time to reproduce the intensity of Nebraska on Born in the U.S.A. I never got it. But 'Born in the U.S.A.' is probably one of my five or six best songs, and there was something about the grab-bag nature of the rest of the album that probably made it one of my purest pop records." and "He wrote in Songs that the title track "more or less stood by itself" and that "the rest of the album contains a group of songs about which I've always had some ambivalence".[48] He further said: "I wanted to take [Nebraska] and electrify it. But it really didn't flesh out like I had hoped it would." "

Marsh (I copied this text using a photo scanning tool, and it didn't render perfectly—if there are bits we decide are good candidates to quote or paraphrase, I can go back and correct these bits to be the exact text):
 * The conversation ran deeper than that, though. In the course of it, Landau and Springsteen talked also about all the changes that had occurred since Born to Run. In a sense, the conversation was a way of reassuring each other about the new album's potential to create a massive, really disruptive success.
 * From the time they'd begun, Bruce had never been sure that he wanted to release such an album. "And then, of course, Jon tends to argue for the other idea, the louder noise. A lot of the things that I'm verbalizing now were implied at the time. And I'd bring up whatever-the ghost of '75 and say, 'Oh, that was a pain.' There were a lotta consequences that Jon was arguing for. And generally I guess I felt I'm the guy that has to face 'em," he said many months later. "And I was right." He laughed. "So on one hand, this always undercuts Jon's arguments in these areas, a little bit but not that much,' he added, sobering up again.
 * Bruce's arguing position was in favor of quiet, personal music-soft noises that satisfied him and kept his profile low; it was all he needed to do. He stuck to it as he and Landau talked the matter through not one time or ten but over and over again for weeks. He simply wasn't sure that he wanted to be that big, that exposed.
 * "We had made a record that was pretty off center for me, it which I think is good. And I think those records should and I want to make other ones. But they're not the only make, Bruce said. "But that's where I was left I was over there. And I spent a lotta time by myself, for a long where I did not have a lotta contact with everybody else. 1 really that great a place to be left hung out at. But that's was and so then when we began to make a new album, the the process was one of slowly kinda moving back, until locked in, I knew what we were gonna do, I knew what I wanted to do. So Jon's place in this is he's just kinda coachin' me. And we do this through arguing, and sometimes just have to say a bunch of things and then once I say em, they're over. I'm arguing with myself is what I'm doin'.
 * "Part of myself is saying, 'Hey, don't do that, why do that? 16 nice like this.' And then the other part of me is saying, 'Yeah, if you could pull this off.' And then the other side: 1f you do that you know, you're hangin' way out there and who needs it?" Г- sure it goes on inside of anybody who's a public figure and I suppose it goes on inside of everybody to one degree or another."
 * It went on with special relevance around the issue of what as kind of record Born in the U.S.A. was going to be, however. The new trend in the record industry was for blockbuster albums keyed to a string of hit singles Michael Jackson's Thriller, which produced seven Top Ten hits, is the archetype-resulting in mega-platinum sales: 5 to 15 million copies (Thriller sold 38 million). Coupled with the heightened visibility due to video exposure (in the wake of MTV, music video programs had proliferated from the networks to local cable channels), the result was the most intensely saturated sort of fame. Just the kind thing that Bruce had been dodging since Born to Run.
 * As finally released, Born in the U.S.A. had numerous poten tial singlesseven of its songs became Top Ten hits and there were at least two others ("Bobby Jean" and "No Surrender") which would have had a good shot if they'd been issued on 45. Clearly, if Bruce allowed this music to reach the public, his public profile would soar, and that was something that always- and justifiably-made him skittish.
 * "But at the same time, the big question came up. I had worked hard to get through a certain door and I had an opportunity that I had created for myself." Consciously or unconsciously, Bruce's image of standing in a doorway, trying to decide whether to walk through, again threw him into the realm of John Ford's The Searchers.
 * In that film, John Wayne spends five years tracking his young niece, who has been kidnapped by Indian raiders who massacred the rest of her family. Wayne doesn't play an uncomplicated good guy; he is an unreconstructed Confederate soldier, there are indications that he may be a highwayman, he is a racist, and although he initially intends to rescue his niece, he decides to kill her when he finds that she's been taken as a wife by the Indian chief. But when he finally does catch up to her, after a long ride across the desert, he sweeps her up in his arms and brings her home. In the film's final scene, all the other characters enter a house, but Wayne is left standing outside, framed in the doorway (scenes viewed through the dark side of such portals are the film's recurring motif). He adopts a noble posture, holding his left arm with his right, but the film ends with the door swinging shut on him, forever barring him from what's inside the house.
 * "The John Wayne character can't join the community, and that movie always moved me tremendously,' Bruce said. But if the experiences Nebraska and its aftermath had dragged him through had any value, it was to reinforce his desire to belong to just such a community, to cut him loose from the illusion of the romantic loner, to make him understand that in real (not mythic) life, making your stand all by yourself is a miserable impossibility. "In the end," Bruce said, "it was a variety of things that kinda threw the argument in one direction, but my feeling was that I'd created an opportunity for myself and why cross the desert and not climb the mountain?" So, at the last moment when he could have turned back from superstardom and its threatened betrayal of self, class, and quality, he pushed forward precisely because it seemed the only way to preserve those things he most cherished.
 * "This was '84 when this was happening and I started 1n so that had been twenty years. And where I was at that moment was the result of thousands of small decisions that I'd made daily since I was fifteen. The decision to stay inside and play guitar, the decision to watch the band all night long instead of chasin' girls around the CYO or whatever. The decision to watch the guy's hands on the guitar. The decision to quit school, to take chances. There were just hundreds, thousands of 'em, throughout my whole life. And we had 'Born in the U.S.A.'- we had that cut, and that was kinda sayin', 'All right, come on.'
 * "I knew that that particular song was just a song that comes along once in a while, even if you write good songs. It had some power to it that seemed to speak to something that was 80 essential, similar to the way that 'Born to Run' did. It's not that you have better songs or worse songs, but that's a particular type of song. "And I wrote that song with an intent. I had an intent. And I put a rock and roll band together with an intent. And the intent · · · was a loud noise intent.
 * He had been speaking soberly, but now he found himself cracking up at the very idea. "I guess that I felt that the rock band is there for use by the public. It is a public service situation. And I felt that essentially when it came down to it, that was my idea from the very beginning, because that was where my roots came from. The people that I admired the most were people who did that or tried to do that or made that attempt. They did not back down. Or turn away. They took it as far as they could take it. For better or for worse."
 * Jon Landau was not insensitive to what an enormous decision he was prodding his best friend to make. On the other hand, he continued to push in that direction for a simple reason: "I believed with all my heart that Bruce could do this." As they tumbled around the issue, Jon reminded Bruce that they had created structures that could withstand everything a massive hit would bring, a protective community that would help deflect some of the superstardom mania and might absorb and productively channel the rest. It was a huge task and a bigger risk. The question was whether Bruce was ready to take it.
 * "Me and Jon sort of get into these types of arguments," Bruce said. "And what is happening at the moment is, the answer is already there. We're not figuring something out, really. I'm in the process of centering myself and Jon is assisting me in doing this.
 * "At different times in my life, because obviously you can't stay there all the time, I'll go off to this side or that side. And particularly when I'm out of contact with Jon for a long time. Basically I'm a guy [who has] extreme emotions and extreme feelings but I act right down the center, most of the time. My behavior and my actions tend to be very focused and very centered. They always have been. So I would say, Jon's daily job is essentially that he centers me. And if I get way out on one side, we may have a series of discussions and eventually I'll feel myself coming back to the middle. So at this period this is kind of what was happening.
 * "It gets me in contact with what my real feelings are, what I really want to do. So essentially, it came down to a pretty simple thing. In the end, as much as I hate to say it, but in the end, what we did, that was what I wanted to do. You know, even if I had very strong feelings in the other direction-and I did. And what I wanted to do was what I'd set out to do. And if I had the opportunity to do it, I really wasn't going to be able to do anything else."
 * In the end, then, Bruce Springsteen accepted the mass mania-and all its consequences, imagined and beyond belief- because he really did believe what his songs said, including the part that didn't just welcome everyone's participation but openly and actively solicited it. So he chose the Loud Noise, and Born in the U.S.A. was up and running. (Marsh, pp 181−185) Moisejp (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Plotkin

 * With Bruce uncertain of his own direction, the music they made that summer lacked the confidence necessary for great rock and roll. They made some decent tracks in those long, hot weeks—"Stand on It" and a new version of "Pink Cadillac" (the one they ultimately released) among others—but nothing was up to the level of the material they'd recorded the previous May. Plotkin, the closest thing to a newcomer in the byzantine Springsteen recording process, felt almost estranged. He just couldn’t hear the value in the songs they were cutting; he found them forced, the one thing good rock and roll can never be. Communication broke down.
 * Plotkin remembered the summer with a shudder. "Bruce would ask me what I thought about a guitar solo, and I'd say, I don't know. I don't know what the song's about. I don't know whether the guitar solo's the right guitar solo, because I'm not getting any hit off the song.' He'd say, 'Well, all right then, I'll just do this guitar solo.' After two or three of those responses, he just stopped asking me what I thought. I went through a period for about two months where we hardly talked. I was there every day and hardly ever expressed an opinion because he stopped asking me, and I didn't have any opinion about anything except the songs.
 * "It sounded like Bruce was trying to recover from Nebraska. He was trying to find some new footing, and he was writing stuff that was not really rocking, and it was clearly meant to rock. That was the main thing: He was ready to rock again; he wanted to and he knew that was what he was gonna have to do or he couldn't finish, and he made a valiant effort to get a series of things to rock that were written from a place inside of himself that was just not rocking." …
 * But workaholics don't make it so easy on themselves. As August approached, Springsteen proposed not that they needed a vacation but that they were finished with recording and ready to start final mixes. In retrospect, even Bruce doesn't quite understand his thinking. "When we started to mix the record, I don't really know what we thought we were doing. We must have thought we had an album."
 * The task of proving the point first fell to Chuck Plotkin, who began by asking Bruce to explain exactly which songs were on the record as he imagined it. "I said, 'Well, look, Bruce, you tell me what it is that we're gonna mix, what cards are on the table. I'll wade into the stuff and I'll take the best rough mixes that we have and let's string 'em together. I'd like to hear the record before we mix it.' " So Springsteen gave Plotkin a list of songs with a basic idea of their sequence.
 * Plotkin and Toby Scott went back into the Hit Factory by themselves and over five days assembled Bruce's version of the new album. What Plotkin heard confirmed his worst suspicions: They were a long way from finished. "And I was scared to death because our communication had just dwindled away to nothing," Plotkin recalled with a shudder. "That was one of the low points of my involvement with Bruce, because I was just scared to death. I was in a state. I strung the stuff together, and I said, I’m gonna master these rough mixes. Because I've got to figure some way to get him to listen to this as if this is the record.' "I'm talking to Jon every day about this. 'Jon, how can tell him this?' 'You just have to tell him.' I said, 'My only hope is to get him to listen. I'm not gonna tell him anything. I'm gonna bring the disc down there, and I'm gonna say, "Bruce, look, let's just put this baby on and let's see how we're doin'." Real nice and easy. And hope that he can hear it. He'll see the disc—he's taken a week off, he'll know. 'Cause I just can't say what I have to say. I know he won't take it from me right now.’ 'Well, just go down and do your best.'
 * "So we set up a meeting in New Jersey and I walked in with the reference discs. I said, 'Let's put this baby on and hear it." Bruce said, 'What do you mean?' I said, 'Well, I've got this all put together here. Let's just listen to it. We don't need to talk about it.' He says, 'I don't want to listen to it.' He says, 'Charley, you just spent five nights all by yourself in the studio, listening to this stuff. Tell me where we stand.' And I wanna go, 'But Bruce, you haven't listened to a word I've said in the last eight weeks. We haven't talked. What difference does it make what I think?' I didn't say this, but that's what I was feeling. I said, 'Geez, I really think we oughta just listen to this stuff, you know. We'll just sit here together and we'll be able to hear what it is. You don't really want me to tell ya what I think.' He said, 'What the hell do ya think I hired ya for?'
 * "And I thought [groaning], 'He's not gonna listen to the thing. I'm gonna have to tell him.' So I said, 'Well, I can hear the album. I can hear the album we're making. This isn't it.' [He laughs.] Because I couldn't be negative. 'This isn't it but I can hear it; I know what this record is about. And I know what of what we have is working, and I know what isn't working and I know what's missing. And we're real close. I can make one great side out of your song list, but I can't make two great sides out of it. I can make a great opening side or a great closing side. But I have a feeling that what we have is sort of like marking posts.' I said, 'If you listen to "Born in the U.S.A." into "My Hometown," that's the whole thing. That's the record."
 * "And he bought it—he bought the whole cloth."
 * What Plotkin was selling (with Landau's essential concurrence) was an alternative vision of where they were at. As the producers saw it, the problem with the album was twofold. In the first place, there weren't quite enough songs that fit together in order to make a great album. In the second, a great deal of the best material they'd recorded was not on these reference discs. Springsteen's interest in "Downbound Train" had recently revived; "My Hometown" was part of the story from the time it was recorded, and Bruce had always regarded "Born in the U.S.A." and "Glory Days" as the core of the rock and roll LP. But "Cover Me," "I'm on Fire,' "Working on the Highway," "Pink Cadillac,' "I'm Goin' Down," and "Darlington County," all of them recorded more than a year before, had been abandoned. Those songs were among the best Bruce had ever recorded because they felt almost effortless—not casual or throwaway but sung as if Bruce were for once performing without burdens. In the months since, Bruce had felt just the opposite, and the new songs, no matter how hard the rhythm section kicked, showed the strain. He needed some more songs and everyone simply had to wait until he'd written the right ones.
 * Bruce's response to their conversation, Plotkin recalled, was almost immediate. "Two nights later, we went into the studio and he said, 'I have a song I want to cut.' We cut 'Bobby Jean' and it was like the fever had broken." (Marsh, pp. 164−168) Moisejp (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Questions

 * What do you think about the bullets I have under singles about 'context'? I thought it could be a useful background about why U.S.A. had so many singles (especially compared to other Springsteen records), and Springsteen's first ventures into music videos (aside from "Atlantic City", which was done without his involvement anyway). – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think they're good details, useful background. :-) Moisejp (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Do you think we need more critical reviews in reception? I wasn't able to find Billboard. I'm sure I could find more on Newspapers.com but if you think we're good I can start forming that. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Especially if we're just aiming for GA for our first round, what you have already could be a good start. Glancing quickly, I notice Harrington is negative but I didn't immediately spot other negative ones (I may have missed them). If we want possibly more reviews, without wading too deep into Newspapers.com, quickly looking at the "I'm Goin' Down" article, it looks like Bohen, M. Daly, Fine, Gill, Hinckley, Kaye, Kishbaugh, Radell, Sill, Willstein seem to mostly be reviews from summer 1984. From memory, I think Gill and Hinckley may not have been overly positive reviews. I may not have a ton of time this weekend but if I do manage to find time, I can try to sift through these and pull out some quotes. Or if you have time and happen to want to jump in and look at them, please do. Thanks Zmbro! Moisejp (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's definitely a good start, as I have a basic gist of the overall reception. But more would certainly be helpful. :-) – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)R


 * Do you own/have access to a full copy of Himes' book? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my late reply. I did scan the entire Himes from a library book as a single PDF. Its 27 MB. If you need it and you have a good way for me to get it to you, I'd be happy to. Or if you there are particular pages you want to ask about, I could fill in the blanks for parts you're working on. Moisejp (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to compress it and send it to via email? :-) Thanks – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Btw I realize now that we're coming up on the anniversary pretty quickly (only six weeks out as of tomorrow April 23). I'm going to be gone on vacation the week of May 20 so I've begun forming and putting everything in prose. It has come up on us rather quick it seems (we started this project two months ago) but it seems we now need to get a move on if we want it published by the anniversary. I'm wanting to get all the general info in now and focus more on details later (if we want to). I apologize for just throwing this on you given your busy schedule, but it only hit me late last week how little time we actually have left. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Zmbro, I sent you the file just now. OK, about the anniversary, sure, I can't promise I'll have a lot more time than I have had, but I'll try to make time where I can, and especially I'll try to make sure whatever contributions I do make are for general information rather than little details. :-) Moisejp (talk) 02:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * When writing these album articles, I try to write them in a way that reads like a narrative at that point in time. For example, in The River article, instead of saying right off the bat in recording history, "Recording sessions for the The River lasted 18 months", I say "recording began in March 1979; reconceptualized in September; recording continued until August 1980 for a total of 18 months". For BitUSA, I'm a little stuck because we have sources that basically write everything from a retrospective viewpoint (i.e. "most tracks composed Nebraska, while others appeared on Born in the U.S.A."). Do we write the article in that way, where instead of writing it like a narrative at that point in time, we write it from a looking back POV? Doing it like this the last paragraph of background would say the majority of tracks from the Colts Neck tape composed Nebraska while the others appeared on Born in the U.S.A.; and we start recording with "Recording for BitUSA took place over two years." Or do we do it narratively, which would be consistent with the other Springsteen articles I've written? I ask because I don't really know how to start recording history atm without "Recording for BitUSA took place over two years." I'm positive I can make narratively work, but since "Cover Me" came from a session for another artist it's a little hard. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 19:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think you can make the chronological approach you've started work. I threw in an idea of where we can add "Cover Me' without disrupting the flow. See what you think. Let's try without "Recording for BitUSA took place over two years" and if it's really not working, we can reconsider our approach afterwards. Moisejp (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I added a few sentences to Background. One issue we may have if we use the content I added with what you have before that is that we say "Born in the U.S.A." and "Downbound Train" were on the demo, but it doesn't say they weren't part of the core songs he was considering for Nebraska and that the band tried to record in April, but we do say Springsteen was dissatisfied with the April recordings, and we're going to say he re-recorded those two songs in May. So it may be confusing where those two songs fit in the overall narrative. I think we can make it work, we just may need to figure out exactly how. Moisejp (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry I missed the big picture that you already had a Recording History section and that the new content I wrote was out of place. :D My attempts at a contribution were all for naught, tee hee! ;-) Anyways, no biggie, I will try to jump in find other places I can add content soon. Moisejp (talk) 01:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I added sub-sections for recording history. It is much warranted. I'm not sure about the titles, but in terms of content I think they are good separation points (Nebraska and initial sessions, continued sessions, final sessions) – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I now have recording history good to go. In terms of outtakes, I have all the outtakes that have been released so far but does Heylin (if you own that book) happen to mention which ones are still (as of rn) unreleased. Himes mentions a few but not all. Since there's no BitUSA deluxe set yet (which I'm shocked there isn't) it would be nice to lay out which ones are still missing. P.S. feel free to start copy editing the section as I'm sure it needs it :-) – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Outtakes
Sounds good, listing outtakes is something tangible I can definitely help with. I'm going to start by listing them below, from Heylin's Song by Song, then cross reference them with Heylin's other book and Marsh. There may be something like 40+ unreleased ones but I won't know for sure until I list them all. Then we can decide whether there are too many to list them all in the actual article, and the best way to present them. One idea might be in a collapsed table so they won't disrupt the flow too much. Anyway, we can see when we get the full list. For now I won't mention songs that were alternate versions of officially released songs, although we could decide later (or not) that it's worthwhile to delve into some of them. Heylin gives info about often multiple known recording sessions for many of the songs.
 * Good list so far. Make sure to add page numbers and such :-) I'm thinking at the bare minimum we should mention all the songs that are currently mentioned in the prose itself (I.e. "The Klansmen", "One Love", etc.). Maybe we can add a collapsible table to start then see how it looks and go from there? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've started listing the page numbers. I'll try to finish that soon, and to put together a collapsed table. Yeah, for the ones we list, let's consider starting with ones that are described by multiple authors. I've just glanced quickly and see there's at least a medium amount of overlap between what Heylin lists and what you already have in the prose there, so we have already a good base of songs to include. But the nature of outtakes is that sometimes they can be speculative, and sometimes (for example in some cases they're just titles that Heylin has seen on Sony recording sheets) you could never be sure if, for instance, the title has changed and two songs are actually the same, things like that--so for the iffiest ones it's good if we're careful. Moisejp (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The Kindle location numbers seem to have all changed since the last couple of times I began listing them. I'm a Kindle newbie and I need to figure out what that means before I cite any more location numbers. I looked a bit online just now but didn't immediately find the answer, but I'll look again soon! Moisejp (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, as I think I might have mentioned before, I remembered from my "I'm Goin' Down" research that there is an edition of Heylin's E Street Shuffle that also includes the content from Song By Song at the end. That edition is available here: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL28684320M/E_Street_shuffle The Search Inside function doesn't let you freely browse from one page to the next, but if you enter a keyword, you do seem to be able to access all the pages with that keyword. So if I enter keywords from all the BITUSA-session pages from my Kindle Song By Song, I believe I can get screenshots of the corresponding pages in E Street Shuffle, but this time with proper page numbers, not with funny Kindle location numbers. (With a bit of trial and error entering various song titles, I may be able to also get screenshots of all or most of the "main" E Street Shuffle BITUSA-session pages as well.) I'll do that in the coming days and replace the Kindle location numbers below with proper page numbers. And then do that collapsed table we were talking about. Thanks for your patience! :) Moisejp (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm back after a busy week. I plan on cranking my output on this up to overdrive; aiming to publish by the end of next week before I go on vacation for a week. Please copy edit as I'm working (and especially after publishing). I'll likely nominate for GAN after I publish (with you as co-nom – gotta figure out how to do that). – zmbro (talk) (cont) 20:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll try hard to focus on copy-editing as well as finishing the outtakes section. I hope my contributions will be enough for me to warrant the co-nom. ;-) Moisejp (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm leaning towards thinking that for the GA version we should just call the section "Released outtakes", drop the collapsed table, and otherwise keep the section as it is now. Then for the eventual FAC, we could come back and take a closer look at how we want to handle the unreleased outtakes. The unreleased outtakes are already mentioned throughout the article; if we do mention them again in a table, it could be OK, but I guess the purpose of the table would have to be to include a complete list all in one place. As the table is now, we'd also have to be sure we had enough "notes" to justify the Notes column. I just kind of think there are bigger priorities for now if we want a GA version ready in the next couple of weeks. But let me know if you disagree! :-) Moisejp (talk) 03:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've started the lead section but wanted to know if you want to take a stab at it? Lead sections always feel like my weak points lol. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 20:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Zmbro, let's leave the lead for the very end. I'm pretty sure between the two of us we'll be able to come up with something adequate for our initial GA nomination. That'll also give me a chance to (hopefully) complete my copy edit of the whole article in the next two or three days and get a good sense of some of the details that it might be good to include in the lead. Thanks again so much for the immense amount of work you've put into this. From what I've read so far it's looking quite solid. Cheers, Moisejp (talk) 03:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

+ Also mentioned by Marsh.

Post-River songs recorded 1981–1982

 * Robert Ford - recordings include Power Station April 1982
 * Danger Zone - recordings include Hit Factory Jan 1982
 * Fist Full of Dollars - Colt's Neck spring 1981
 * My Heart is an Open Book - Colt's Neck spring 1981
 * Riding Horse - Colt's Neck spring 1981
 * All I Need - Colt's Neck July 1981
 * Vietnam Blues - Colt's Neck Oct–Dec 1981
 * Love is a Dangerous Thing - Colt's Neck Oct–Dec 1981
 * Club Soul City - Colt's Neck Oct–Dec 1981 + - Also given to Gary Bonds for his album

Songs demoed or recorded for Nebraska or Electric Nebraska

 * Fade to Black - one version was May 1982 Power Station
 * The Losin' Kind - recorded at Colt's Neck, Power Station (April 1982), Thrill Hill West (1983)

Other songs demoed Jan–April 1982

 * Workin' on It
 * Out of Work + - Also given to Gary Bonds for his album
 * Hold On
 * Love's on the Line
 * Savin' Up - appears on a 1983 Clarence Clemons LP
 * Protection - given to Donna Summer
 * True Love is Hard to Come By
 * James Lincoln Deer
 * I Need You
 * Ruled by the Gun
 * Love Is All Around Me
 * Follow That Dream +
 * Baby I'm So Cold
 * The Big Payback

Other songs recorded during the Electric Nebraska April 1982 and Born in the U.S.A. May 1982 sessions

 * On the Prowl + - Marsh actually only mentions a live performance
 * William Davis
 * Gun in Every Home
 * Common Ground (Stay Hungry)
 * Murder Incorporated - released on Greatest Hits +
 * Stop the War

Songs demoed Jan–April 1983 (all recorded at Thrill Hill West (Springsteen's home) in Los Angeles)

 * The Klansman
 * Seven Tears
 * Delivery Man
 * Betty Jean
 * One Love
 * Little Girl (Like You)
 * I Don't Care
 * The Money We Didn't Make
 * Johnny Go Down

Songs demoed acoustically (Thrill Hill West) the recorded with E Street (Hit Factory)—Jan–June 1983

 * Sugarland +
 * Body and Soul
 * Don't Back Down (On Our Love)"
 * Fugitive's Dream / Unsatisfied Heart <-- I think Heylin is saying these were variations of the same song, but not 100% sure
 * Richfield Whistle

Other songs recorded with E Street May–June 1983 (Hit Factory)

 * Gone Gone Gone <-- I think Heylin is saying this evolved into Seeds (Live '75–'85)
 * King's Highway
 * Invitation to Your Party
 * Bad Boy
 * Just Around the Corner to the Light of the Day, aka Light of the Day +
 * Drop On Down & Cover Me
 * Car Wash (Small Town Girl)

Songs recorded for BITUSA Sept 1983–Feb 1984 (Hit Factory)

 * Glory of Love
 * Shut Down
 * 100 Miles from Jackson
 * Roll Away the Stone
 * Swoop Man
 * Under the Big Sky
 * Refrigerator Blues
 * Ida Rose (No One Knows)
 * Beneath the Floodline <-- Not clear that it was recorded during BITUSA sessions, but Heylin includes it as a possibility

Final thoughts

 * Should we add a small sentence on Nebraska critical and commercial performance in "initial sessions"? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, I think especially the commercial performance, possibly critical too, could be good context for comparing with BITUSA's subsequent huge commercial success. Moisejp (talk) 21:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * "My Hometown" release date: M&G state November 21, 1985 (a Thursday). Dolan says November 18 (a Monday). M&G supported the date that is on that song's actual WP article so I went with that before I noticed Dolan's date, but wouldn't Monday make more sense as a release date? Idk if you could find any other source that supports that though. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Just now I checked all November 1985 Newspaper.com mentions of "My Hometown... Springsteen... single" (26 hits) but unfortunately none mentioned a specific date. I had used Newspaper.com sources for the release date of "I'm Goin' Down" so I was hopeful for here too, but no dice. Interestingly, one source from early November said the initial planned B-side at that time was "War". (Not sure if that's common knowledge, but I didn't know it.) Moisejp (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The basic lead layout is now written. Some questions:
 * Do we mention Grammy nom for album of the year? I'm not a huge of the Grammys and don't particular think it's worth noting but bias aside, do you think it's worth mentioning? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Do we mention Springsteen's reworked image during the tour? I'm leaning towards no but there is commentary on that throughout legacy... sidebar, it stuns me there isn't an available photo of him in that look from that tour on here. Insanity. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the lead is very good and is long enough. I also have reservations including the Grammy nomination (I almost cut it while copy-editing your earlier versions, but hesitated about what to replace it with. Moisejp (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Other thoughts:
 * I think the fact that this album was the very first CD manufactured in the United States would make for a good DYK, what do you think? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree! Moisejp (talk) 21:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * What's the final day before your holiday that I should try to fit in any copy-editing by? I'll probably be squeezing it in during small windows of time between now and then. :-) Moisejp (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I leave on Friday and won't be back for over a week. With your permission I'd like to go ahead and publish it then make other copy-edits while the GAN nom is up. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, sure, we can publish it and I guess make copy-edits after. I just realized I haven't done a GAN nomination in about 6.5 years. After that all my activity has been bringing existing GAs to FA, but even that has only been 4 articles over the 6.5 years. Anyway, the reason I brought that up is I'm possibly out of touch with GA protocols, and I was slightly wondering if any would-be GA reviewers might be turned off if the nominated article was still being edited and "unstable"--but maybe not, it's just a thought that crossed my mind. :-) Moisejp (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * By the way, in case it really comes down to the wire, can I ask what time zone you're in? :D I'm in Pacific Standard Time. Moisejp (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * U.S. Central :-) – zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)