User talk:ZoUcArDsFAN87

Welcome!
Hello, ZoUcArDsFAN87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Tax does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - lollerwaffle (Talk) 02:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tax, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire ( talk ) 03:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Also, please note that Wikipedia has a policy on edit-warring called WP:3RR. You're close to that limit now, making the same change again will put you past the limit.  Please use the article talk page to discuss the change.  It's probably been brought up before, and it's supported only by a minority of reliable sources.  Your view is covered in the article already - see the section under Views called Opposition. Ravensfire ( talk ) 03:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing is about citing reliable sources. A wikilink does not count as sourcing, but there's nothing to source because your change violates our due weight policy to such an extent, it is considered vandalism. So this warning is for you to cease from that, or you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Thanks. El_C 03:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)