User talk:Zodiiak/Archive 1

Dwyane Wade
I propose removing all the "only player to average (x) and (x) and (x) stats per game in a so and so" from the Wade article. As a matter of fact I'll do it myself. As the GA reviewer said on the article's talk page too much stats ( and a lot of it is extreme Fancruft) non basketball fans turn off and stop paying attention and it becomes boring. See the article's talk page and respond to me there to discuss this. Thanks. Quadzilla99 06:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually I created a subpage see the article now to have a look and comment on the article's talk page to discuss this. Quadzilla99 07:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia by the way! Quadzilla99 08:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied in discussion--thanks for the welcome =) Zodiiak 19:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Bill Russell
I noticed that you are a member of Wikiproject:National Basketball Association. I'd like to ask a favor of you: Bill Russell's article is a Featured Article Candidate and I'm worried that it may not pass merely because there are not enough reviewers looking it over. Would you mind looking it over and seeing if you feel it meets the criteria. If you have never done so before all you have to do is look over the criteria and see if it meets them. You can pass, fail, or stay neutral. Don't worry if you don't like anything in the article you can state so and usually people will work to improve it. Here is the candidacy page. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 08:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll take a look at it, and add it to my watch list =) Zodiiak 19:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Dwyane Wade
I tinkered around with some of the changes you made to the Wade article, please don't get upset. Maybe we could work on the Off-the Court section together. A lot of these sections end up being random collections of information with 1-3 sentence paragraphs which are against Good Article criteria. What I find is that if you find ways use creative linking sentences you can eventually tie it all together into solid 6-8 sentence paragraphs. Like "Player x proved himself a popular endorser and was involved in numerous endorsement deals such as..." as it stands right now it doesn't flow together smoothly. It would be easy to break it up into sveral small paragraphs but that could hurt it if it's GA status gets reviewed and lead to it's removal from the GA list. Maybe a start would be making separate "personal life" and "media figure and business interests" section like we did in Michael Jordan's article. Quadzilla99 05:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * One thing for example: right now the stuff about his devout Christian beliefs is important but it's hard to transition into, and is too short for it's own paragraph. Quadzilla99 05:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I actually completely agree. I was reading through the article and a few paragraphs just felt like random sentences strung up, and not fluid enough.  That is why I was proof reading it just now, to try and work on the transitional sentences, linking, etc.  The subsections for business/personal life might be a bit premature...i'm not sure how much can be done about the business aspect of Wade, as he is only in his third year...but I would definately try and contribute as much relevent info as possible. Zodiiak 05:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Good work, I was actually going to suggest one minor adjustment (removing "able to transfer") but you fixed it already. Looks pretty good right now, could maybe use a smoother transition into the mentioning of the nicknames. I can't think of one as of right now though. Quadzilla99 06:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks...If it's in the same paragraph as the endorsements, you could mention how his nickname flash was used in ads, comparing him to the superhero flash, even though it was originally given to him by Shaq from the Flash Gordon theme song. That same paragraph could be used to mention his popular converse slogan of "Fall down seven times...stand up eight"

Career achievements of Dwyane Wade
Being as you work on the page there is a stat on the NBA Milestones section that is blank. It reads: Four consecutive games doing what? I think it was shoot 70% and take 15 shots or more shots per game in the playoffs or something. Could you fill that out please? Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 08:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Four consecutive games, May 23rd - May 29th, 2006


 * Ok, took care of it Zodiiak 19:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * It still doesn't makes sense as it says he had set an NBA record by shooting 69.5% and averaging over 30 ppg for an NBA playoff series (last year versus the Pistons). However it then states in the next line that he set an NBA record by doing so over 4 consecutive games (the series went 6 obviously so the numbers aren't for the entire series just 4 out of the 6 games) so the record isn't for a series it's for any 4 consecutive games in the playoffs. Or is it any 4 consecutive games in a playoff series? Or is it any 4 consecutive game in the Conference Finals? Does the series thing have any meaning? I know you didn't add it so don't take it like I'm blaming you but it needs to get fixed and if you weren't around I'd just remove it as it currently makes no sense. Thanks. Quadzilla99 11:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Shots made/attempted, Month/Day, Total Points 9-11, 5-23, 25pts 11-20, 5-25, 32pts 13-17, 5-27, 35 pts 8-11, 5-29, 31 pts 4 Consecutive game Averages of: 30.75 points per game, 14.75 attempts per game, shooting 69.5% (41/59). Game 5, he was 11/20, finishing with 23 points. Game 6, the flu game, he was 6-15, 14 points [10 assts].
 * You're right. I had to do some digging (http://www.nba.com/playoffs2006/series_detmia.html), he set it in 4 consecutive games, for game 1 through game 4, not the complete series.  Here's what it looks like:

I didn't add it, I think those are really really specific numbers, but some actually find those numbers interesting, so I'll adjust it to make sense Zodiiak 20:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

C.B.
I know that he is listed as 6' 6" on nba.com but nba.com doesn't always tell the truth. There are many websites which say that Barkley is at 6' 5". Search it on google. So Please do not revert my edit. Thanks. MM 14:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I took my time to search informations about Charles' height and I must say, there are different versions about his height. On the one hand, he is listened as 6' 5", on the other hand as 6' 6". His height is rather involved to verify. Are there any solutions? MM 14:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Michael Jordan is definitely one inch taller than Charles Barkley. Well, is there a way to contact nba.com? Because 6' 6" for Charles Barkley is not right. MM 14:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You're assuming his height based on a picture, and uncreditable resources. With regard to the picture, who's to say Barkley is standing straight, not slouching, etc. Yes, many sites list him from 6'4 to 6'6. Barkley makes note of his controversial playing height in all his published books. The NBA has always listed players taller than they really are. Nate robinson is listed as 5'9, but is closer to 5'6-5'7. It does not matter, nba.com receives their information from the a players listed playing height, while in the NBA. Players, and announcers alike have always joked about a players supposed playing height or weight. The UserBox for all nba players on Wikipedia is designed to reflect their playing stats, and Barkley's playing stats, with regard to his height, has always been listed, in his 16 year career, 6'6'. A note on his height has been made in the subsection titled, early life and college career. If you want to make an added note in the introductory paragraph, then I believe that would be best. However, I do not think footnotes or skeptisms have priority over a players listed playing height/Billed Height, as noted by the NBA. For further discussion please discuss on Barkley's talk page. Zodiiak 20:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Barkley has admitted he's "6'4 and 3/4" in numerous interviews but as is Wikipedia and NBA policy we use their listed height. I actually added a source: to the Ben Wallace article where he directly admits in an Associated Press story that he's 6'7 (he's listed at 6'9) but I never thought about changing the listed height in the article. Quadzilla99 09:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Since D-Wade gets a lot of vandals, I thought I'd take a second to just make sure that you know that after a user has received several warnings you can report them to WP:AIV, at which point they'll start getting blocks. Obviously this works for any article. Keep up the good work by the way. Quadzilla99 14:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info, and appreciation ;) Zodiiak 14:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jordan
hi, do you have any thoughts on the FAC going on for the MJ article? thanks. Chensiyuan 13:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Overall, I think the article is in great shape, well written and sourced. I think there's only a few important notes that should be added to it, that may currently be missing.  Such as how the first Air Jordan's were in violation of NBA rules, how he always wore NC shorts under his uniform--leading to longer shorts which became a trend in the NBA, shaving his head bald --leading to another trend, and recapturing the title on Father's day--leading to him pouring out his emotions (I think that was the year, or the year before, when his father was murdered) Zodiiak 18:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Good work

 * Wow, thanks so much for the recognition. It is greatly, greatly appreciated ;)    Zodiiak 21:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Jordan FAC
The Michael Jordan FAC has been re-listed (which was probably a good idea). Thought you'd like to know, here's a quick link. Quadzilla99 14:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Regarding you third edit (I like the first two), there were a lot of complaints on the FAC about using "would be eliminated" instead of "were eliminated" and "would go on to" instead of "went", so I would change them back or shorten them. Basically they wanted the least amount of words as possible, as several people complained about wordiness. But the "would go on to" and "would ultimately" were complained about. Keep in mind that's how I had them originally, so I thought they were fine too. Quadzilla99 20:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Feel free to continue copyediting the article by all means, just keep that in mind. Quadzilla99 20:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow. What's funny is, the way we've been writing it, is how it has been written in every biography I've read. But thanks for the heads up, I'll change it and be a bit more careful with the wording. Zodiiak 20:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, apparently they also want the tense to always be went, lost etc instead of would lose or would go on to. I complained about it too as you can see, but gave in so as to get it passed. I guess they like the least amount of words to be used as possible. Also they want consistent tense to be used. Quadzilla99 21:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a sensitive article and you know the FAC better than anyone else on here. So, I'll refrain from making any edits until I've read the entire FAC. I'll give it a few scans though to make sure everything is concise. Great work by the way, I know it's been incredibly tough trying to satisfy everyone. Zodiiak
 * Here's the link I meant to add: Basically it was copyedited this way by a couple of editors who complained about what I told you. If you looked at it beforehand you would see I had it almost exactly the way you were putting it. Quadzilla99 21:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

If I could recap for you, basically all the concerns were addressed except for Peter Isatalo's, whose inane ramblings were useless and idiosyncratic, and Zagalejo's who thinks it still needs more copyediting (some of them aren't crossed out but trust me they are all addressed). I would let Zagalejo do the copyediting personally, as he already started it this morning. He has been a big critic of the copyediting and despite myself and a couple of other editors copyediting it he hasn't been happy just yet. So it's probably for the best that he just does it himself. Incidentally a lot of the copyediting was done by other people so I want to keep them happy. I say all this because when I reverted your edits, it might have come off like a classic case of WP:OWN and wanted to make clear that I wasn't fighting to keep my own wording in there. Just that the current wording was arrived at in a lot of cases in response to complaints and was copyedited by other editors who had complaints. Quadzilla99 21:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I understand ;) Zodiiak 23:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Incidentally you should enable an email address (it's in your preferences profile). I was going to email you a source or two for Barkley and D-Wade that I was thinking of using to improve their articles, since I was busy I figured I'd email them to you so you could use them. They are from pay only sites (ESPN Insider and NY Times archive) so I couldn't put their content here. Quadzilla99 00:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, just confirmed my address. Feel free to send and thanks in advance for the articles ;) Zodiiak 00:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, don't make it too long maybe 2-3 sentences should be alright. Quadzilla99 01:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

"Tha Chucksta"
I looked over Barkley, it looks real good. All you need is the personal life section like you said. I made a couple of minor corrections of stuff that was pointed out to me during the Jordan FAC. One statement was incorrectly sourced, I tagged it you should be able to fix it fast. Quadzilla99 18:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm going to use the Link to the Phoenix newspaper archive to get some off the court type info. Thanks for your help =) Zodiiak 18:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Dwyane Wade
Are you upset? I think the other stuff is valid. Quadzilla99 15:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I see an anon added it it in my bad. Quadzilla99 15:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah I didn't add it...and no, I'm not upset at all. I was actually working on Editing it out when I saw an Edit Conflict occured. Injuries always occur during the season, and I don't think Shaq's injury should be highlighted. The Heat's entire season has been injury plagued (from Shaq to Coach Riley), but I don't think it deserves special notice, unless of course the Heat failed to make the playoffs. Again, I'm using the whole historical value logic of it...which I think really helps when deciding what should or should not be included to avoid inflating Wade's bio...that type of stuff I think is better suited on the Heat's page Zodiiak 15:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah okay. It does put Wade's injury into perspective maybe you can tweak it. Just to say that the Heat were struggling but getting healthy after early season injuries when he got injured. Quadzilla99 15:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds good...I'll try and find a complimentary source as well...i'll take care of it in a few hours =) Zodiiak 15:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Career achievements: The ref that was in there didn't mention that he was 2nd in NBA history, that was why I removed it. I knew he had made 22 straight bu tnot that it was second (that was why I left it in the Heat section). I'll let you figure that whole thing out. Quadzilla99 21:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh I see the fact tag (which he added) was on the 22—should have been on the 2nd in NBA history. I still don't see 22 straight in here: but I remember that he did hit 22 straight. Like I said I'll let you sort it out. Quadzilla99 22:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it doesn't mention that he hit 22 straight, but he did, which is the only reason I was even aware of there being a record for most consecutive free throws in a game...right before he missed the one to tie. After the season, it'll probably be added to his 2006-07 season summary. Either way, it's a fact, and should not be removed. Zodiiak 23:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Should be fine. The problem is with WP:Verifiability whether it's true or not, it needs a source if it's disputed, so if the anon disputes it again it could be a problem. Note that even though you and I know it's true WP:Verifiability isn't concerned with truth just verifiability. Quadzilla99 03:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, let's hope he's not anal about it or I'll have to try and dig up the video tape! lol. Zodiiak 03:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Toronto Raptors
Hi, as the article is going through a FAC nomination now, I would be happy if you could provide some feedback on how to improve it. Chensiyuan 03:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll give it a good read and then leave my comments. Thanks for the notification =) Zodiiak 05:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your help in improving the article! Hope the FAC nom goes well now... Chensiyuan 01:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem =) It should go fine, the only issues seem to be minor copy editing, and once more editors contribute, it'll go through well..it's just a matter of time. By the way, thanks for your contributions to the Charles Barkley article. I've been working on that one for a while now, and will hopefully be able to bring it up to to good article then FA status. Thanks again. Zodiiak 01:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Nickname
I commented on that. About that user, see my comments here (last section) I think he bears a little watching. Quadzilla99 08:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Couldn't agree more. He has been excessively confrontational and has exhibited more than his share of wp:own behavior. I myself have agreed that certain edits are a bit intricate, but I do not remove any data because it was simply my own opinion, and other editors have worked hard on obtaining the data. If you look carefully at his edits on LeBron James, Career achievements of Dwyane Wade, and Kobe Bryant, you'll notice he has went around and removed tons of noteable information because it rareified a particularly young player, yet he adds plenty of wp:fancruft to Career achievements of Michael Jordan. Zodiiak 14:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Stop being biased
Dwayne Wade is known around the league for recieving "phantom calls" and flopping all over the place. This is the controversy. I don't care if this is reflective of the officiting or not it is the controversy associated with his style of play. He is the one falling all over the court looking to draw fouls and apparently other editors find this a important detail about Wade as well as myself. Furthermore, this is supposed to be an unbiased forum for facts. Who made you god of Wikipedia that determines what is right to put and what is not? Get a life. If you don't like it don't read it, but everytime it is deleted more things will go up (that are based on FACTS) and are not made up. Check wikipedia for the definitions of balance or unbiased if don't understand where I am coming from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.110.81.47 (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC).


 * I'm not biased. If you would bother to read the discussion pages, you would realize that this was a big issue last year with regard to the Finals. It's not a critique on Wade, but rather the officials, and their supposed preferential treatment for star players, dating all the way back to Michael Jordan. In retrospect, it's trivial, compared to something of real controversy, i.e. Kobe's Rape Case, or the Knicks/Nuggets Fight. Moreoever, as you stated, it is something that is reflective on the NBA's officiating, not on Wade. There are more noteable players who have been known for drawing fouls, such as Reggie Miller, who kick his feet out to draw such calls. Zodiiak 19:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Good move this is heavier than last time when it was denied. Quadzilla99 19:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * He's actually only done three reverts thus far, somone else has to revert it I'm close to passing 3RR on the article myself. Quadzilla99 19:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I reported the anon for violating the 3RR rule and engaging in edit warring.
 * Oh he's actually way over I didn't see the edits this morning. Quadzilla99 19:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

(undent) Good news. Should be a lot more peaceful this week, I don't know if you remember but it was ridiculous when they unprotected MJ a while back. Quadzilla99 22:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah I know. I reported the user for his new sockpuppet account, not sure why he keeps trying to avoid blocks. Zodiiak 22:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * WIkipedia's a fun place sometimes ain't it? Lol. Quadzilla99 00:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL, no doubt about it. Zodiiak 00:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Toronto Raptors
Your welcome, and thanks for the barnstar. It is greatly, greatly appreciated. I'll keep scanning the article and taking care of anything that might've been overlooked. Thanks again =) Zodiiak 03:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

NBA MVP
Hi, i removed some vandalism on that page, i'm sorry if i missed any, i'll have to check the history in future.CEP78 05:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries, it happens when the Undo only reverts the last edit, and not the additional vandal edits behind it. It happens. =) Zodiiak 05:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

LeBron james page for semi-protection
I see you've been working on the lebron page a good deal and it is evident vandalism has been a large problem and is hindering further work on the page. I submitted the request for semi-protection of the page the other day however it was declined on the basis, that apparently there was not a enough activity to warrant protection (which is far from the case). I was wondering if perhaps you could submit the page for semi-request this time. cheers. Duhon 19:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Admins have a tendancy to deny requests unless excessive vandalism has occurred, and is currently occurring. They judge this based on the amount of reverts and warnings issued to users. In that case, I don't think it's entirely necessary to get protection as of yet, just a keen eye on the Watchlist should suffice. However, if the amount of vandalism increases, then we can make a strong case in favor of protection =) Zodiiak 19:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Huh?
Are we having some kind of problem? Quadzilla99 23:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Response at MJ's talk page. Zodiiak 04:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I sent you an email. Quadzilla99 17:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied =) Zodiiak 18:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I sent you one more, probably unnecessary, email. I'm making a slight tweak to the D-Wade text now. Quadzilla99 18:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I explained the Olympic thing a little becasue an editor on the Jordan FAC stated that we brought up the Dream Team/Olympics in the middle of the article like people knew what it was, but it doesn't get dealt with until later. Could stand a tweak maybe. Quadzilla99 18:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, makes sense. Zodiiak 19:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

CB
One or two suggestions for Barkley; one team record I would mention is 1991–92 since they finished 30–52. It says they missed the playoffs, but teams miss the playoffs by going .500 the fact that they were 22 games under .500 shows the average readerhow putrid they were. For example Olajuwon's Rockets missed the playoffs the same year but were 42–40 so they weren't that bad and were able to build a contending team. Also, when he and Pippen played together they traded barbs and Pippen left in part of their animosity: You'll need to find a better source though. Everything looks fine there, overall.

Incidentally, did you see this guy today?: Quadzilla99 19:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops! I got the numbers wrong it was 35–47. Quadzilla99 19:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the friendly advice =). No, I actually didn't notice he mirrored my name. Hopefully I can contact an Admin about that. Zodiiak 19:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, looks like he was blocked already. That Lobster fella is back though. Zodiiak 19:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Lebron
Nice work on Lebron, one thing; I think, although I'm not 100% sure, dashes remain hyphens in section headers. I think this is to avoid confusion because editors frequently link to direct sections, like History of the New York Giants and many don't know the dash rules. It's not directly mentioned in WP:DASH but I'm pretty sure it's standard practice. Quadzilla99 20:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks...Ok, i'll take care of it. I was following the same format as Dwyane Wade (the section headers are dashes there), since it has received a good article status. Zodiiak 20:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. I think I did that when I first found out about the dashes, good eye. Quadzilla99 21:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Tyrus
I thought you should be aware of this: Requests for comment/TyrusThomas4lyf. Also I need help with some diffs regarding the Jordan POV. Quadzilla99 11:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See here for a filled out RFC, if you wish to do so you can start your own list of diffs and statements. I didn't have the energy to do all the Jordan/Bryant/Wade/James diffs. You can also start your own start you own section see here. Quadzilla99 11:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I added my own description and added a few diffs from the LeBron James and DWade pages. I'll add some more info when I get the chance. Zodiiak 21:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)