User talk:Zoe

Please don't leave
Please don't leave, Zoe. I'm very saddened by what happened in the last few days, but it can blow over. We've never edited the same articles, and would probably disagree on a lot, but I've always seen you as someone who cared a lot about Wikipedia and who was good for the project. I am quite sure that Jimbo would not want his hasty words to lead to any permanent hurt, and it's quite obvious from looking at his contributions that he was preoccupied with real life matters for a few days after his phonecall with Mr Pierce, which would explain why no notification of that phonecall was given to the community. It's also clear that his post on WP:AN/I was written hastily, as he had been away from Wikipedia for a few days before, and didn't post anything immediately after, so it's very likely that he forced himself to find time to make a post in order to close the matter immediately, but didn't take the time word it in such a way as to take into account that you were trying to protect Wikipedia and that you didn't know it had been resolved. His own words on his talk page two days later indicate that he did not have any wish to hurt you. Please, Zoe, don't let this lead to a permanent break with Wikipedia. You are highly valued here. Musical Linguist 17:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Desysopped
In case you return, someone just used your account (among others) saying it had been hacked. It's been emergency desysopped. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * In case you just randomly read this page: I miss you. - brenneman  23:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * From that old discussion, I don't see why anyone had to make such a big fuss about it. Thankfully, they're both in better places now. PotentialDanger (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nandor (Middle-earth), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Otto Fruhner
Zoe,

You once deleted Otto Fruhner because a vandal had posted nonsense. As a matter of politesse, I am informing you that I am re-establishing it as a legitimate biographical article of a World War I flyer.

Georgejdorner (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:H59543.png
File:H59543.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:USS Monitor-H59543.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Devoucoux
An article that you have been involved in editing, Devoucoux, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Devoucoux (2nd nomination). Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unionsoap (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC) I linked it to Sare in the Basque contrie and horse tackel. The AfD result was a ' Keep ' result.Wipsenade (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Minnesota Meetup
 2009 Proposed date: Saturday, October 10. Details under discussion. Please share this with anyone who may be interested.  Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Charles Wadsworth -  (I'm trying to exspand it)--Wipsenade (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Ivan Davis -
 * 3) Marsha Mason -
 * 4) Robert E. Connick -

November 9, 1985 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect November 9, 1985. Since you had some involvement with the November 9, 1985 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mistakefinder (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lists of cemeteries by country
I have nominated Lists of cemeteries by country, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lists of cemeteries by country. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The AfD result was a-  'Keep'  result!--Wipsenade (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:NurembergTrials.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NurembergTrials.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokemon/Blastoise listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Blastoise. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Blastoise redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokemon/Bulbasaur listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Bulbasaur. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Bulbasaur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC).

Awards
During your 5 years hear, you made enough edits to become a Labutnum grade editor.Wipsenade (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Well it was more than five years, but at any rate, due to the recent Service award reforms, your level was actually these: It says that this account was compromised... if you have a new account, you may of course count the start time and edits of this (old) account in determining your service award level for the new account.

At any rate, thank you for your long service and many contributions to the Wikipedia. Herostratus (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cinhil Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cinhil Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cinhil Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Muscat) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Muscat, Zoe!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed, well done!"

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Baguio (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baguio (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Baguio (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Torenth (fictional) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torenth (fictional) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Torenth (fictional) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Javan Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javan Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Javan Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maia (Middle-earth)


The article Maia (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fictional being/race. No indication of passing WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aulë


The article Aulë has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this fictional character passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)


The article Nandor (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this fictional group of characters passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Nandor (Middle-earth) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandor (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nandor (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Aulë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aulë is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aulë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ulmo


The article Ulmo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manwë


The article Manwë has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edain


The article Edain has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this fictional race passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Edain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celeborn


The article Celeborn has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nienna


The article Nienna has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yavanna


The article Yavanna has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Varda


The article Varda has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Manwë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manwë is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manwë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ulmo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulmo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ulmo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ossë


The article Ossë has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Celeborn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celeborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Celeborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Varda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Varda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ossë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ossë is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ossë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

"Octagon, disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Octagon, disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Octagon, disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Aman (Tolkien) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aman (Tolkien) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aman (Tolkien) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Calaquendi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calaquendi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Calaquendi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf


A tag has been placed on Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"I don't think this page is needed."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Interstellarity (talk) 02:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Miracle Worker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Miracle Worker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Miracle Worker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan from A.P. (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

"BokmaalAndNynorsk" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BokmaalAndNynorsk&redirect=no BokmaalAndNynorsk] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Robert Stroud
Robert Stroud has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Norfolk, Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Portland Trail Blazers
Portland Trail Blazers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)