User talk:Zoe.weber

Welcome!

Hello, Zoe.weber, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species


The article Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species


The article Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article has an obvious bias; arguments and claims belong more properly as part of the Genetically modified organism article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TreacherousWays (talk) 19:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Deletion Request Removals
You may not have been aware, but removing tags for deletion request is against the rules. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Nomination of Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I have a question for you
Are you writing this as part of a school project? Let me know, because if so I think someone at Wikipedia might want to speak to your instructor about how Wikipedia works. For one thing, as you can see from all the canned stuff above, writing for school or college is exactly what Wikipedia is not about; your instructor wants you to put original research - your own analysis - into whatever you produce, but Wikipedia needs editors not to add their personal analysis and thoughts to the article. Sort of the opposite to what you need for school.

At any rate, I wonder if you could reply to the questions people are asking here, either at the incident report mentioned above or right here. One of the things that has people het up is that you aren't discussing things, even when asked. If you could, it would really help. Thanks. --NellieBly (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Moved to user space
Aloha. I've moved your new article to your user space where you can work on it. You can find it over at:

User:Zoe.weber/Social, Ethical and Legal Implications of Bioengineering Animal Species

For more ideas, you may want to look at Synthetic_biology. Thanks for your good work. Viriditas (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)