User talk:Zoe Trent Fan/Archive 47

August 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic characters, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''
 * After another editor reverted your previous edit, you should have discussed the change on the article's talk page, as to avoid edit warring (see WP:BRD). Also, please avoid using accusatory language towards other editors, such as you did towards .'' — bieχχ (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to My Little Pony, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Meltdown
Hi, I anted to further explain why I made the latest change to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Meltdown. That plot summary appears verbatim in official promotional materials for the book, and can be found at https://wimpykid.com/books/book13/. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. A plot summary written in original text would be a welcome inclusion on the page (if you wanted to write one, that would be great), but we simply can't have unattributed text taken from elsewhere. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks. Since I am taking in about what you said about copyright, I decided that when I have the chance, I will make a new, original plot for Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Meltdown, okay? Thanks for reading this, LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

How to write articles that won't be rejected or deleted
I noticed that your draft, Draft:Under a Red Sky, only cites a review from the Jewish Book Council (which is an independent reliable source) and a synopsis from the author (which is reliable but not independent). You just need a couple more sources like the Jewish Book Council (professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources) to establish notability. Anyway, here's the steps I give to almost anyone writing almost any article:

If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:
 * 1) Choose a topic whose notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.
 * 2) Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find. Google Books is a good resource for this.  Also, while search engine resutls are tnot sources, they are where you can find sources.  Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.
 * 3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.
 * 4) Summarize those sources left after step 3, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer.  Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.
 * 5) Combine overlapping summaries (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports) where possible, repeating citations as needed.
 * 6) Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism.
 * 7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.
 * 8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.

If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:
 * 1) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author.  If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea.
 * 8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make edit requests on the article's talk page.
 * 8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely.  If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.

Ian.thomson (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmen Sandiego (disambiguation) has been accepted
 Carmen Sandiego (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Carmen_Sandiego_(disambiguation) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuzzy Mud (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fuzzy Mud and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fuzzy Mud, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fuzzy_Mud Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fuzzy_Mud reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Fuzzy Mud has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fuzzy Mud. Thanks! AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I read the comment you left when you reviewed the draft. Thank you for the suggested reception you left me. I also added the SLJ review, but will you have the ability to review it again (I didn’t see the resubmit button)? LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuzzy Mud (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Fuzzy Mud may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:LPS_and_MLP_Fan Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:LPS_and_MLP_Fan reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuzzy Mud has been accepted
 Fuzzy Mud, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fuzzy_Mud help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Hi, please check out the references i posted on Talk:Fuzzy Mud. There are some interviews and some more RS reviews (Publishers Weekly, NYT) you can use for a possible development section. Also there are some websites that have regional library awards for the book. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sincerely,    Masum Reza ☎  08:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * , thank you for the welcome notice (although it’s kind of late). LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Arthur Rubin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1991 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. You (and the IP) duplicated August within January. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * , oops! I’m sorry about that. I was trying to revert unexplained content removal and I must have put the deleted content in the wrong section. I promise I will avoid future mistakes like this. LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 00:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Signature
My apologies didn't intend to, pasted the template in the wrong place thought I undid the edit.DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 03:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * thanks for the apology. You are forgiven. Just be careful with where you put the template next time. LPS and MLP Fan  (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 03:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bindi ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Littlest_Pet_Shop_%282012_TV_series%29_characters check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Littlest_Pet_Shop_%282012_TV_series%29_characters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Willenden
Leaving aside the error in choice of template, you still haven't shown that the book (not movie) meets notability.

That said, I did some research, and the book does meet notability criteria. You just haven't established that yet. Cite a minimum of three reliable sources (i.e., not Goodreads or Amazon). DS (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, I had to delete your picture of the book cover. "Own work" does not mean "I took the picture of the cover by myself"; if it did, you could cancel anyone's copyright just by taking a photo of it. DS (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Children of Willesden Lane (June 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Children_of_Willesden_Lane Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thegooduser&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Children_of_Willesden_Lane reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thegooduser  Life Begins With a Smile :)  🍁 01:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)


 * on the page, you said it is a film. It is a book. LPS and MLP Fan  (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 01:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , I used the wrong template, I meant to decline using the book template. Thegooduser   Life Begins With a Smile :)  🍁 01:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi LPS and MLP Fan. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ALPS_and_MLP_Fan enabled] rollback on your account&#32;until 2019-06-11. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 00:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.


 * Good job so far. Be sure to keep carefully checking edits before you roll them back.   AGK  &#9632;  20:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you for the barnstar! It’s the first one I ever got! LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 19:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure! Glad to be part of one of your Wikipedia milestones. :)  -A la d insane  (Channel 2)  19:56, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Bad Piggies
Hello. As of your last edit of Bad Piggies, you revert the vandalism edits separately, making it unable to revert completely on my computer. Next time, on your computer, click in "View history" on the Bad Piggies article, click in "undo" on the vandalism edit, and click in "publish changes".

Fortunately i did revert completely separately the vandalism edits for you. Thanks. PedroLucasDBr (talk) 12:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , I edited the article using my iPod, which doesn’t have the “undo” feature. Thanks for completely removing the vandalism, anyway. LPS and MLP Fan  (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 15:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi LPS and MLP Fan. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ALPS_and_MLP_Fan enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 08:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LPSandMLPFan'sTeahouseProfile.png


A tag has been placed on File:LPSandMLPFan'sTeahouseProfile.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi LPS and MLP Fan. If you want to take two public domain or otherwise freely-licensed files you find on Commons and combine them together into a new file, then you can as long as you do so in accordance with the terms of the files' Commons licensing and you don't upload your version under a license which is more restrictive then each individual file's Commons licensing; you cannot, however, combine a non-free file like File:My Little Pony Friendship Is Magic logo - 2017.svg with a Commons file, and then upload the file under a public domain or otherwise free license without the explicit consent of the copyright holder of the non-free file. You can possibly claim "own work" for the way you combined the two files together per WP:DERIVATIVE and c:Commons:Derivative works, but you cannot upload the file to Wikipedia as "own work" unless you are the copyright ownership of each of the individual files you used to create your version. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Helping out at the Teahouse
Just a belated 'Thank you' for recently adding your name to the list of currently active Teahouse Hosts. Our aim is to be a friendly and welcoming place to support new editors. As such, it's important to welcome each person and always Assume Good Faith in the way you respond. If you've not already done so, please ensure you read what we expect of all Teahouse Hosts. Of course, there's nothing stopping any editor answering questions at any time, so those who have signed up but have not been actively helping out there for some while may eventually be removed from the list. To monitor or discuss how we manage the Teahouse, please visit: Wikipedia talk:Teahouse.

Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

The Teahouse and YouTube
While I appreciate your efforts to help out at the Teahouse, the answer you gave regarding the reliability of YouTube videos was not entirely accurate. Please do your best to offer answers that are accurate. Thank you. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  19:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Please read this
Guidance for younger editors. Thank you. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  22:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * When you speculate about whether you are the youngest Teahouse host, you are encouraging other young editors to share their dates of birth and implying that you will share your own date of birth for purposes of comparison. This is personally identifying information that minors should not share for many reasons. This is not appropriate behavior for a young editor. Please stop. I am asking you to stop for your own safety. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  07:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)