User talk:Zoel

I thought the Duc Soha thing seemed familiar. I deleted it back in October, and I deleted it again. If you create it again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia permanently. DS 14:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

University of Notre Dame
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Notre Dame. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. mtz206 00:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

W. Carter Aikin
Do not create articles to attack non-notable people. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Penguin Vic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penguin Vic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Penguin Vic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Closeapple (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Welog.PNG


The file File:Welog.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Color garden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Color garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Color garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)