User talk:Zolboo77

Hi, I see you added a notice on the "Mongolian Youth and Childrens encyclopedia" to the Chingünjav page. I think I know this book, the original title is Mongolian, it is big and red and has three volumes, is it not? In such a case, I think the more correct format would be (forgive the mispellings): or or Or you simply use the Cite book template, then the correct format is only the concern of the people who maintain the template. In any case, I think it is usually better to give the original (in this case: Mongolian) title of a book. Translation may be useful in some cases, but only as a supplement to the original title.
 * M.Jamyandorji, Ts.Namsrai, E.Oyun, N.Tsultem, Sh.Tsegmid, Mongolyn Khüükhed Zaluuchuudiin Toli Bichig, Ulaanbaatar 1983, vol. I, p.238, 398, 400
 * M.Jamyandorji, Ts.Namsrai, E.Oyun, N.Tsultem, Sh.Tsegmid, Mongolyn Khüükhed Zaluuchuudiin Toli Bichig ("Mongolian Children's and Youth Encyclopedia"), Ulaanbaatar 1983, vol. I, p.238, 398, 400
 * any of the versions above with cyrillic rather latin letters.

Best Regards, Yaan (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * While the above is technically correct, the literature given in an article should be specifically about the respective topic. An encyclopedia is a very general type of publication, and usually doesn't qualify. Please also note that in the English Wikipedia, the literature given should also be in English language, or it will not be very helpful for our audience. Exceptions may only be made for books that define the scientific standard on a given topic. Because of that, I had to revert some of your additions again.  --Latebird (talk) 23:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)