User talk:Zonala21

March 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, you may be blocked from editing. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

you are a real traitor! Zonala21 (talk) 19:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Massachusetts Institute of Technology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)