User talk:Zondervan07

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Manmin Central Church, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Wikipedia articles should be based on third party reliable sources, not Jaerock Lee's own website and the newspaper run by his church cab (call)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jaerock Lee. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Articles should be written based on 3rd-party sources which directly address the subject and are not affiliated with the subject. This means: Also, you should not insert information which is irrelevant to Jaerock Lee merely to cast his detractors in a bad light, as you did with this edit, among many others. And finally, please refrain from using alternative accounts when editing this article. cab (call) 06:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) you should NOT insert large amounts of hagiography by rephrasing Jaerock Lee's website
 * 2) you should not use sources which advertise for Jaerock Lee on their front page, like the Christian Telegraph or others written by Lee's Ukrainian and Russian associates, are not acceptable either.
 * 3) you may use mainstream Korean newspaper like the Korea Times, JoongAng Ilbo, etc.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jaerock Lee, you may be blocked from editing. As has been repeatedly explained, self-published sources, including sources which Jaerock Lee or his associates write about himself, are NOT reliable sources and cannot be used to support assertions in Wikimedia. Do not attempt to deceive Wikipedia editors by trying to disguise a blatantly obvious press release as a citation to CNBC. Furthermore, do not link to blogs which post copyrighted materials without permission. cab (call) 11:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jaerock Lee, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have already been warned sufficiently about using non-neutral sources in this article as an excuse to insert flowery, hagiographic language about Lee. cab (call) 04:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Jaerock Lee
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jaerock Lee, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.manmin.or.kr/english/introduction/introduction.asp?sec=1, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jaerock Lee and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jaerock Lee, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jaerock Lee with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jaerock Lee. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Jaerock Lee saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Elizium23 (talk) 04:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)