User talk:ZooPro/Archive June 2009

Talkback
-- VS talk 08:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ZooPro am I correct in assuming that you are a relatively new user across the number of projects listed on your talk page (from say early May this year for nearly all projects)?-- VS talk 08:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:ACC Tool Re-application
No, 73 edits and less than a month of time here is still not the amount of experience needed for ACC. Fun Pika  10:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you give me a estimate or time frame to work from just so i am aware of when to re-apply. I cant seem to find the information anywere on the ACC pages. regards ZooPro (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably depends on whichever tool admin handles the request, although I usually go for 3 months/1000 edits (though a little less is acceptable for me). Fun  Pika  10:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollbacker request
Hi again ZooPro. I have now assessed your contribution history. I note formally that you have engaged yourself in a number of wikipedia projects and you appear to be clearly interested in becoming an established editor. That said the difficulty I have in providing you with rollbacker rights is that I cannot establish any history in vandalism fighting. I appreciate that you edited as an IP account for a year and that you are clearly not and editor less than the month's experience your registration defines - but as detailed here - users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. My view is that you should establish a history of capable vandal fighting over the next 2 or so months and then return to me and I will be glad to reassess. I hope that you accept the reasons for this decision. Best wishes. -- VS talk 10:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)