User talk:Zoravar

My talk page
&#123;&#123;SUBST:Nosubst&#124;Signatures/Zoravar}} (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Indian Air Force
Please provide a source for you edits in the Indian air Force aircraft inventorary. currently India has a confirmed 124 Mig-Bison. I havent found any infomation on any other Mig-Variants currenrly active in the Indian Air Force!

I do know the IAF has been scrapping many Mig-21s for many years now as the Mig-21 is very old and obsolete Rademire (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Indian Air Force 2
There is a link, you can find it on the top of the table under the heading In Service. Here you go, I will show you the link. http://www.milaviapress.com/orbat/india/index.php Rademire (talk) 10:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Indian Air Force 3
I will trust any safe and reliable source you can show me. But I havent seen any sources from you! All I have seen is your edits with no sources!. I also see other people editing stupid numbers with No sources.

Please edit the page and put your sources in : ) then every thing will be ok!. So just remember, when you edit the numbers Put the source in too!

I think maby when you edit the numbers you forgot to put the source in too.

Thank you. Rademire (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

List of aircraft of the Indian Air Force / Current Aircraft
all mig-21 will start retiring from 2012 onword not now, why the data of MiG-21Bis , MiG-21 M/MF and MiG-21FL had been removed.

refer:-

The Official Home Page of Indian Air Force

http://indianairforce.nic.in/

http://indianairforce.nic.in/show_unit_page.php?pg_id=23&cat=F

they include MiG-21Bis, MiG-21 M/MF and MiG-21FL till now updated 17/feb/2010.

again kindly note :- MiG-23 MF is still in service, for training purpose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mundhravinit (talk • contribs) 20:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

no retirement declaration
Rademire refered this link - http://www.milaviapress.com/orbat/india/index.php

is this link says MiG-21Bis, MiG-21 M/MF and MiG-21FL had been retired.

vinit mundhra (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Indian air force
Dude, thanks for your edit, I cheaked the sources and agree with the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum source, however I dont agree with the Mirage source as it only syas 40 mirage were inducted in the 1980s and a further 20 were inducted later. How ever some of those aircraft have scince been scraped due to the aircrafts old age. I revterted the edit. Rademire (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

The source that is already on the list. Mirage is an old aircraft, its impossable to keep them flying becuase they get so old. when they get old the airforce takes their valuable parts and scraps the rest of the aircraft Rademire (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Aircraft in the IAF
Hey there,

I noticed you did make a few changes to the sourced aircraft numbers. I would only request you don't drastically alter service numbers as I think it makes the article less accurate. While MilAviaPress isn't the most reliable source, both User:Recon.Army and I agree that we should keep most of the numbers in line with the MilAviaPress IAF Orbat listing so that there is some consistency. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 23:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Unless its a huge change in service numbers, I think it's best to leave the primary reference as MilAviaPress. Newspapers may or may not be more reliable but listing multiple sources detracts from the accuracy of the article. It then just becomes a rough guess. The best solution is to wait until MilAviaPress updates their information or refer to another source like this.Vedant (talk) 18:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Please look at the following articles:
 * RAF
 * French AF
 * Russian AF
 * USAF


 * If you'll note that aside from a few of the service numbers, the majority of them are from one source. This is done to ensure that there is some common standard by which aircraft are judged as in service or not. Also, see this section as to why it's not good to source numbers from numerous sources . Vedant (talk) 04:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hal dhruv.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Hal dhruv.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)