User talk:Zorro544

I have undone your edits and the edits of your IP these spreading wrong information the admins will be alerted. The arabrometer poll was about religious vs less religious not about irreligious and atheism so be careful. By CircassianBilyal

I have undone your edits
I have undone your edits and the edits of your IP these spreading wrong information the admins will be alerted. The arabrometer poll was about religious vs less religious not about irreligious and atheism so be careful. By CircassianBilyal CircassianBilyal (talk) 12:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

 * Yamla I am sorry, but I didn't know where to ask that. I'm a bit new to wikipedia. Zorro544 (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


 * GeneralNotability Ok I see. So basically, if another user is doing block evasion or keep doing sockpuppetry despite being also banned I can't report it? I heard that it was possible to do it by mail but I'm not sure of what I'm saying. That's just what I wanted to know. And thank you for the answer. Zorro544 (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Zorro544, GeneralNotability is correct, you can't revert obvious vandalism, because you literally can't edit articles. Your account is blocked from editing anything other than your talk page. I don't think there is a specific rule about whether you can or can't notify someone about sock puppetry. But if you abuse your talk page, you'll be blocked from editing it too, and if you abuse the e-mail system you'll be blocked from that. The definition of abuse is up to the judgement of an admin. If you are seen to be using your talk page to continually carry on a dispute with another user or ping other users to ask them to make edits on your behalf, it will soon be seen as abuse. Even if your talk page access isn't revoked, it could affect your chances of getting unblocked if it looks like you just can't stop battling. That's why I said that you should stick to only legitimate concerns about your block itself. I suggested you read WP:BANEX because it talks a bit about that, but maybe I shouldn't have, because the whole thing doesn't apply to you. Basically what's safe is:
 * addressing a legitimate concern about the block itself on your talk page, including asking for necessary clarifications about the scope of the block, which you can do by pinging or e-mailing an admin or adding a "help me" template, and
 * appealing the block, which you can do using the "unblock" template.
 * You certainly won't get unblocked before six months from now. And even then, it's not at all guaranteed. In the meantime, I would recommend that you just take a break and try to stay away. If you speak another language, you could edit in that version of Wikipedia, if you're not blocked there, or on some other Wikimedia project. --IamNotU (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * IamNotU I got frustrated by Arsi removing informations about irreligion in muslim countries, and it seems like it isn't the first time that he does it when I check his talk page. I have heard that you could report for edit warring and vandalism but I didn't really understand well how to do it (again I'm a new user), so I didn't know how to deal with the situation and I've created two accounts (which are MuhammadxHusayn and ChechenWarrior), I shouldn't have done this and be more careful because that's especially what got me banned but anyway. I don't mind coming back in 6 months (I can't create another account anyway unless I change location), But I wouldn't appreciate if Arsi does it again and is removing every sources that is posted about irreligion in muslim countries or editing numbers that are not said in the source just like he was doing before. And if I come back in 6 months I am afraid that he would do it again. As strange as it seems, it's the only edits he reverted from me. And concering your last paragraph I'm already doing it. Zorro544 (talk) 10:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I understand that it's frustrating. Because of how Wikipedia works, there are many people who push certain beliefs no matter what reliable sources say. A lot of the information in Wikipedia is wrong, and it will always be that way. Try not to get upset about it. Try to stop thinking about Arsi768 for a while. It's not that important, in the big picture. The way Wikipedia works also makes it the greatest encyclopedia ever made... It's more important for everyone to follow the rules and act honestly and in good faith, than to correct any particular wrong information. Wikipedia is not finished, we always keep working on it, and fighting against disruptive editing. Let other people take care of it for now, it will still be here in six months.
 * I'll do my best to remove anything that Arsi768 changes while blocked, I spent about an hour last night doing that. He has continued to make sock puppets and edit, and by now there is pretty much no chance he will ever get unblocked. I will also be sure to remove anything that you change while blocked, because any edit you make while blocked, even if it's correct, is one of the bad ones, a disruptive one, a dishonest one. Please don't be tempted to edit while logged out either. I, or someone else, will be able to tell it's you, and you will probaby never be allowed to edit again. Practice editing on another Wikipedia, use reliable sources, don't edit war or sock, use dispute resolution instead. If you can show a good record, you're more likely to get unblocked here. --IamNotU (talk) 11:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * IamNotU Ok thanks for the answer, I think everything is clear now and I'm glad. But just a question, why was the edit on Religion in Kazakhstan removed? And it's fine, I think the best is that I should wait for 2021 before doing another unblock request and going back to edit here and putting some sources, while being more careful because I also went too far on that one. And I'm already editing another Wikipedia, I guess the next time I will do my unblock request I could show what I've done on that other wikipedia. Zorro544 (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * why was the edit on Religion in Kazakhstan removed? - what did I just say about using your talk page to carry on disputes about edits? It's not your concern right now. --IamNotU (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * IamNotU Concerning your previous comment I think it was removed because of sockpuppetry and block evasion. I need to stop focusing too much on that and just wait or I don't think it would make the situation better for me. Zorro544 (talk) 13:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Continued socking
After all the above, the user has continued to sock as Special:Contributions/ShamilAzeri... --IamNotU (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)