User talk:Zorya's Leshak/Archive 1

UAA
Hello, Zorya's Leshak. You've made 15 reports to WP:UAA in about 45 minutes. However, many of the accounts you've reported have zero edits. In general, administrators tend to only block users with zero edits when their usernames are particularly terrible, such as when they are racist or extremely offensive. Usernames like "Someidiotguy", "Hdehdgedjeusheudeh", and "Sussyamongusgirl1200" do not fall into that category. Even where an account has an edit, most administrators only block when their edits are vandalism or show that they are not constructive editors. Please see the instructions at the top of the noticeboard.

As another tip, you reported a username containing a telephone number to that noticeboard. However, since such information needs to be suppressed, it is best to follow the instructions at requests for Oversight, so that less cleanup will need to be done. I hope this helps. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Just came to say the same thing. Don't report accounts with no edits. Secretlondon (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Package redirection scam
I think you started this article ..... congratulations on it being moved to 'main space'. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks! there was an account called "Rigid Boxes" that double-submitted the article and immediately got blocked. I think that account got the offical credit for it. Zorya&#39;s Leshak (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Zorya&#39;s Leshak

Thank you for creating Package redirection scam.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @North8000 thanks. I deal with this scam often so know quite a bit about it. Zorya&#39;s Leshak (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lost in transit scam


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Lost in transit scam, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DIVINE  📪  16:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @DIVINE

https://globalnews.ca/news/7652457/online-shopping-fraud-toronto/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ex-worker-posted-exploding-parcels-in-amazon-fraud-bt3l9qk5g

Definitely not a hoax. Just not notable enough yet with 2 sources only. I could find more if you need, but I don't see how this is a "hoax". Zorya&#39;s Leshak (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Garbage feeding
Hello, Zorya&#39;s Leshak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garbage feeding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I did a minor edit to the page --- which will reset the edit counter. Please see my suggestions on the articles talk page. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Triangulation fraud
Hello, Zorya&#39;s Leshak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Triangulation fraud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination on User:RockettMovado/sandbox
Hello @Zorya's Leshak,

I noticed you nominated User:RockettMovado/sandbox for speedy deletion. While the what they were writing was slightly promotional, it was not nearly enough to warrant a speedy deletion. The page was a userspace draft, so they were trying to write an article there, where it wouldn't be deleted, instead of in the draft space.

Sandboxes are made for testing articles and other things. They also created it less than 2 hours ago, so it isn't going to be perfect yet.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out. Thanks, echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  04:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, sorry for the inconvenience. I thought the links looked spammy, I won't tag those types of pages in the future. Zorya&#39;s Leshak (talk) 04:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

All good! echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)  echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fedsmoker (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fedsmoker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fedsmoker Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fedsmoker reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:The Hour of Agony
Hello Zorya's Leshak. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:The Hour of Agony, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 02:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)