User talk:Zourich

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to PFC Levski Sofia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  L a v e o l  T 00:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:4a189aa5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4a189aa5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Levski Sofia, you may be blocked from editing. LoVeCa (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
My friend, please stop your modifications because this article (PFC CSKA Sofia in Europe) is to large. We can create an aditional article with your modifications.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:4a189aa5.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:4a189aa5.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  L a v e o l  T 18:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing, as you did at PFC CSKA Sofia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. AustralianRupert (talk) 21:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The point is that you should be talking about the issues on the talk page instead of edit warring. I warned you about this, and you chose to ignore the warning and continued to edit war. Hence the reason I blocked you. More than happy to discuss these actions with another admin if they disagree with my actions if they feel a more appropriate course of action exists. You are more than welcome to start discussing your concerns on the article talk page once the block has expired and if you can establish consensus to remove the material, then the edit can stand. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You can clearly see, that the issue was discussed many times in the talk page in the past months, without result.  L a v e o l  T never reached an agreement with anyone, he just waits a couple of weeks for things to settle and those who confronted him not being around lately, so he could start it all over again. How can I picture it more accurately, that someone is not belonging somewhere? May be letting Donald Trump editing Hillary Clinton's article, would be the most proper analogy in this case. This warning, my blocking and protecting PFC CSKA Sofia after bringing back proven false contributions, supported by non-existent or dubious sources, are three highly unexplained actions from your side, in a row. There's a definite need for more admins to be involved in this. Zourich (talk) 0:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I see no effort on your part to discuss your proposed changes (can you provide diffs where you have attempted to resolve this?), which were reverted by several users:, , and. I have started a discussion on the talk page, which you are welcome to participate in if you wish to try to achieve consensus for your changes. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)